Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Yeah, the difference between a 1Gb copper network and a 10Gb fibre network will be precisely nothing.
This.
http://www.aristanetworks.com/media/system/pdf/AristaProductQuickReferenceGuide.pdf
Now, would this improvement in latency be noticeable for streaming games from your computer in your bedroom to your htpc in your living room? I have no idea, but would be very fun to test. :)
In the home you will have higher latency in the TVs processing than in the network.
100Mbit/s might be enough for any h264 encoded stream (that is the most common encoder you might find inside any phone SOC or GPU). Blurays are encoded I think at max 40Mbit/s. Even using extra bandwidth instead extra processing cycles to have better quality, I wonder if you ever would need more than 60Mbit/s.
Those are my two cents.
Lucky for me i do have a server and almost no periferel card uses PCI anymore almost everything has transitioned to PCI-E which only requires a PCI-E 1.0 4x connection to provide enough bandwidth to accomodate a 10Gbe adapter. I already have the hardware and am looking forward to testing it out with steamOS.