安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
but for about the same price you can get a 4670 (non k) and a b85 combo
which will do just as good
or if near a microcenter, the 4670k /w z87 comos are cheaper than the 3570k /w z77 combos
http://www.microcenter.com/site/brands/intel-processor-bundles.aspx
3570k= want to overclock
4670= okay with base clocks
both are good, i would personally go 3rd gen, because the new intel mobo line will use different sockets from the 4th gen anyway ( so they dont upgrade either way)
4th draws less power and has slightly boosted performance.
Just depends on budget. If a 3rd gen goes on sale, it's worth buying the 3rd IMO.
Haswell is mostly for power reduction. The hardcore performance users will be using the Ivy-Es.
Haswell in the new Mac Air Book is huge on power saving. Still waiting for the new Mac book Pro in how many more hours it will bag.
Broadwell should see some insanely low wattage processors. Intel has to hit back aganist ARM as well as giving Windows tablets good processing without the ARM limitations.
That is odd. When I had my i5 4-core PC and also my i7 4-core PC and laptop almost no games didn't use all cores.
The features which you get from the different gens are another matter though.