Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you want a good rally game (for fun), play dirt 2 or 3 but not that scam made after 8 months....Only 8 months damn it...
I'm not sure there is anything anyone can say about that! I apologise for buying a game to have fun. My mistake.
- Course condition depends on your starting position on that stage; run early and course is less rutted.
- Tyre blowouts.
- SS stages in rally (and these can be a decent length), including ones in cities that are very tight and realistic.
- Real WRC locations, that feel unique.
- Tyre wear, depending on chosen compound.
- need to manual use wipers if dirt is covering windshield.
Stuff more realistic in Dirt:
- The physics are not as realistic as dirt. (But, still challenging with a pad).
- Pacenotes.
- Weather (especially rain).
- Replays
Long story short, using a pad this is more enjoyable and challenging - without being frustrating - than dirt.
- Pace notes for me is better. I am co-driver myself.
Other things I agree and I hate to drive in any other than sunny wheather in WRC6.
If windshield is not getting so dirty at stages it could be more fun to use incar camera. Now I use that one where you see the bonnet. Some call it a roof cam.
Dude stop writing BS everywhere lmao.......
You made my day
OK ! Peace !!!
I don't know enough to know if this is true, but the physics certainly seem more progressive on a pad, in WRC. As i have said, you can 'push' in WRC and I never felt you could in Dirt (on a pad!). Pace notes I find OK in WRC. Realistic or not I don't know, but fine by me! One thing that makes them slightly more realistic than dirt - for WRC style rallies- is the notification of barriers, as the barriers are WRC style from the real WRC.
"When I play a rally game, I don't want to have fun." I can't stop laughing!! Thats the best comment EVER!!
I just think that if people want a decent WRC game (not the same as a general Rally game), then it is worth pointing out that WRC 6 is OK and enjoyable. This might mean the devs a) manage to work on it more to improve it from where it is now b) can demonstrate what is needed to make a good WRC game. This could be a base for an excellent WRC game (which is not the same as a Rally game with hillclimb, rallycross etc).
I think it's a little sad that you seem so angry at what I wrote when a) I am just saying WRC is OK, b) It doesn't stop you enjoying Dirt c) If you don't like WRC you can get a refund and d) WRC is such a cool sport, the best way of having a decent game of it is to try and offer constructive criticism. I have pointed out the flaws (iffy pacenotes voice acting, weird windscreen, inflexible AI times, excessive fog spoiling some weather conditions).
If you don't like the game, fine. But moaning at people who do like it is no help.
I do think PC gamers need to realise games are meant to be fun, and no game will be perfect. If we all get along and try to offer CONSTRUCTIVE criticism Devs may engage and help us help them get the games we want. Rant over :)
How can you laugh if you don't understand that ? Because it looks like...
I typed that because when i play DR, i play for the competition, i play it seriously...
If i want fun, i play "sega rally"
And BTW you know what makes me laugh ? You still buy these awful WRC games and it seems you like that
That's a fact, WRC and SL evo are for noobs..
Mad because frustrated and bad....