Was this game made in 2005?

[jack]

I have all setting turned up MAX and the game still looks like garbage.

[палач]

might be your conputer

[SHIM BLUESY]

its your computer, it was made in 2011 and if your expecting battlefield graphics, dont.

[Casket The Clown]

Who cares what the game looks like? The point is to have fun.
If you want "ultra-super-mega-uber-awesome grafix!1" go play Battlefield, or better yet, watch a movie.

[Ð乇ｷ乇ζЦ乇Ð]

So do gamers still play this game online?

[jack]

The Wrangler lähetti viestin:

Who cares what the game looks like? The point is to have fun.
If you want "ultra-super-mega-uber-awesome grafix!1" go play Battlefield, or better yet, watch a movie.

Um no, not my computer. Re-read what I said. "I have all settings turned up MAX". The games textures are bad. I have a GTX 770..

[Ð乇ｷ乇ζЦ乇Ð]

DilboBagginz lähetti viestin:

The Wrangler lähetti viestin:

Who cares what the game looks like? The point is to have fun.
If you want "ultra-super-mega-uber-awesome grafix!1" go play Battlefield, or better yet, watch a movie.

Um no, not my computer. Re-read what I said. "I have all settings turned up MAX". The games textures are bad. I have a GTX 770..

what resolution?

[Shakespeare]

it's got some interesting artistic choices, and a rather lightweight engine, for 2005. It's also got far fewer post-processing than most racing games these days (motion blur, color correction, etc.) I noticed the same thing when I tried playing this AFTER a few codemasters racers. If it just drives you nuts, there's always ENB and sweetFX to give it some polish. I was able to bring some color and contrast back, compared to the 'dreamy sunset' look that the art team infused this game with. Dive into your video card settings, too - it's capable of forcing things like better AA/AS, shadow filtering, etc. that can improve the look of the game beyond the original specs. Short of that, all I can tell you is that it's not the greatest LOOKING game, but it's still quite fun. looks aint everything.

[gtmsnba13]

No the game really does look like that. idk why Ubisoft did this but they did. I think someone made a texture pack for this, but I'm not certain.

[DJ-LEXX]

пфф... графoдрoчер eбаный...

[Scrapjack]

I'm gonna assume they scaled down the graphics to ensure 60fps? I mean, it's a driving game, anything below 60 would feel sluggish as hell.

[gtmsnba13]

Tell that to EA with NFS Rivals. Even on next-gen the game is locked to 30.

[Ð乇ｷ乇ζЦ乇Ð]

gtmsnba13 lähetti viestin:

Tell that to EA with NFS Rivals. Even on next-gen the game is locked to 30.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDA37BmvNwM

[Pangolin Legends: Arceus]

gtmsnba13 lähetti viestin:

Tell that to EA with NFS Rivals. Even on next-gen the game is locked to 30.

Surely it's current gen. If not, then at what point will people start calling it "current gen"? When there's a next next gen out?

[gtmsnba13]

Well people still call it next gen because people are still sticking to the PS3 and 360. It's still a viable gaming console for the next year or two, as stated by Sony and Microsoft, as they're still supporting these systems.

[ov.]

Play the game for gameplay, not graphics.