Jagged Alliance Flashback
Ця тема закрита
Sexist steam store picture
The game's store picture is glorifying violence against women, please change it
< >
Показані коментарі 115 із 119
While I do agree that they could have chosen a better picture I don't quite see how it glorifies violence against women.
It's disturbing that you have interpreted that image to be glorifying violence against women.
I suggest that you not look at it anymore.
Is it sexist? Yes sexist as hell and I generally hate it but at this moment I don't for this game. Probably blinded by fandom. However if this reminds you of hurting women you need professional help my friend.
So glorifying violence against men and in generally is ok?
Super Alexa, as your resident PETA representative, I find it in poor taste.. No, I find it outrageously, unforgivenly offensive that your profile picture displays the image of a girl with a poor defensless infant sheep on her head. To wantonly carry a sheep on your head and risk it/her/him being hurt in a drop is heartless. There is no excuse for your behavior. Please change it.
You guys are idtiots....just saying.
As opposed to what? glorifying violence towards men? Does it really matter? They're just pixels when you get right down to it, so lets just relax and play a game...
Probably that the games would allow you to remove those bad guys from existence, so they never hurt women again. By the way, JA 1 had a female character very offensive agains't men. Dunno if there were complains about it.
To me the picture is straight up wierd. I don't get why that is what they went with. It does not make me think Jagged Alliance at all. The covers for the old games were straight up 80's why not a remake or a homage. On the original cover you have some explosions, a bad dude, a good guy and a woman not being assaulted.
I'm confused. Which image are we talking about? The title image with the bikini girl with a gun or the second screenshot where a girl is being smacked around and likely to be raped in the background?

The image with the tile across it is sexist, but does not in any way glorify voilence against women (possibly BY women but not against)
The second screenshot image is not really sexist imo, and although it depicts violence against women it does nothing to glorify it. I see nothing in it that would make the viewer identify with and condone or support what those men are doing. If anything that picture is meant to rally you against those rapist bastard and make you feel good about killing them later on.
I guess I'm missing the part where the picture is glorifying it
Цитата допису ★ Super Alexa ★:
The game's store picture is glorifying violence against women, please change it

....glorifying violence againest women....
so your trying to say just because its a female shotting at a "male soldier" he should just stand there and be shot ?

god its that type of feminizam that does my head in =/....

let me ask you whats your opinion on having female soldiers...
because i tell you if you said that crap to one of my squad mates she'd punch the crap out of the person that said it....


Цитата допису Galacticfish:
Super Alexa, as your resident PETA representative, I find it in poor taste.. No, I find it outrageously, unforgivenly offensive that your profile picture displays the image of a girl with a poor defensless infant sheep on her head. To wantonly carry a sheep on your head and risk it/her/him being hurt in a drop is heartless. There is no excuse for your behavior. Please change it.

Thank you, totally agree with your comment... there are a good % of women who there who can actually give and take just as well if not better then males


Цитата допису telamiina:
So glorifying violence against men and in generally is ok?
agreed.... goes together with my comment at the top, ""its wrong to shot a female enemy combatant, but its fine to shot a male one?.... F**K off.. in combat its 1 or the other

1. shoot or be shot
and
2. in combat there is not gender or colour.... there is the enemy and there is the ally... NOTHING MORE




Цитата допису hawk.racer:
As opposed to what? glorifying violence towards men? Does it really matter? They're just pixels when you get right down to it, so lets just relax and play a game...

also totally agreed... its bunch of pixels... and its not real.... stuff that happens in a game should STAY in the game =/

but i gotta say Super Alexa,,,, i LOVEEEEEEE how you lot are going all witch hunt... oh sorry... "man hunt style" againest the games "box-art" picture... but you havn't said ANYTHING againest one of the screenshots of the girl in the background, next to the bar

"the one that shows 2 guys againest one women,,, with one dude pulling on her top"
but no... sorry my bad... you complain againest a women who looks can defend herself and will kick ass.... but you are not crying over the girl who "looks like shes having problems"....

<heres the link so you can get your ""glorifying"" aimmed at the right picture for =/
http://cdn.highwinds.steamstatic.com/steam/apps/256010/ss_ae1fdb93516169613ef57b0b601df679447a1faa.1920x1080.jpg?t=1400245927

yeah ... AWESOME judge of character.

girl with a gun? = ohhh helll no you cant do that!!!
girl being abused? = ohhh thats ok, we'll ignore that
Автор останньої редакції: 1stReaper.; 16 трав. 2014 о 9:27
The problem is that BOTH Steam store pictures depict troubling gender roles. One as victim the other as sex object. Of course, many here will say that the since the game is based a great deal on satire, this shouldn't be taken seriously. I'd (be more willing to) buy that if there were a range of marketing images depicting a range of satirical scenarios. But these don't - only women's victimization and sexualization.
Please fill out butthurt form 101A.
< >
Показані коментарі 115 із 119
На сторінку: 1530 50

Опубліковано: 16 трав. 2014 о 8:01
Дописів: 119