Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
I mean if I wasn't successful in solving nation's problems (mainly positive fiscal bilance), I was able to pass the 10th round with no error. I guess the game designers have been too cynical.
I stopped playing the game in the meantime, as I was killed by terrorists for successful politics all the time, which is completely unrealistic: A country with either satisfied or uninterested majority weakens the power of extremists. One is also not able to influence or change the security architecture. As democracy is the weakest of all forms of reign, one should be able to change the constitution or election conditions, especially with two-third majority. (Even if the game immediately ends once the constitution changes to autocracy.)