安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Also, the Flat Tax and Income Tax are overpowered when used together.
The income tax system should be re-done from the beginning. It could be done through three policies:
* Flat Income Tax: As it is now.
* Upper Tax Bracket: Higher income tax rate for the wealthy. Angers wealthy people and capitalists. Causes Brain Drain.
* Earned Income Tax Credit: As described above. Increases income for the poor, and somewhat for those with middle income.
In game, it is implied that the setting of the progressive income tax slider is what the richest 1% are being charged (ex: the default setting of USA's tax slider is at 34%, which was the highest bracket at the time the game was made). Therefore, it should earn less income than a flat tax of 34%, because a flat tax means EVERYONE is paying that amount, not just the top 1%.