Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
Well, I agree with half of that. I own a 360 controller and I don't even own an XBox. It's a great controller and it does make some games a bit easier. I use mine all the time with my Arkham games, and Spelunky of course. But I would not say it's a standard. Playing Spy in TF2 on a controller is damn near impossible. If I had to play 85% of my Steam games with a controller I would quit gaming. (Are you listening, Steam Box devs?)
-Indie game
-Roguelike
-No online multiplayer
This is one of the bigger communities actually.
I want to know what factors prevent it growing, and I suspect the lack of wide spread controller ownership is the key. You can't play this game the way it is supposed to be played without a controller.
I disagree, some people are better with keyboards than gamepads, many PC players are.
That just goes to show how little a game of the year status means in the long run. I don't understand why people put so much trust in it. Which games are worthy of this title is highly subjective, and PC Gamer received a fair amount of criticism for awarding it to an indie platformer. Spelunky features 2D graphics, has a cute cartoony art style, features permadeath, is unforgivingly difficult, doesn't have much in-game progression, and is a platformer. Not exactly the stuff that AAA mass-appealing games are made of.
That is a bold claim, and it couldn't be further from the truth. Spelunky has excellent keyboard controls. I'm seriously clueless as to why some people are going around saying otherwise.
No.
I'm being perfectly real. You, on the other hand, seem to state your own opinion as fact. The majority of people preferring the controller doesn't equate to the keyboard controls being bad. That is a serious leap of logic.
Your disregard of the keyboard controls is pointless, if you don't include some elaboration as to why you think the controller is required. But as of now, you're only writing claims with nothing to back them up but your own opinion.
Anyways, as I understand it, an Xbox 360 controller or other Xinput based controller is what is assumed when a game advertises controller support on Steam, even if the game supports other controllers. This is also what is recommended on the Big Picture page. If people want to use third-party controllers they should expect complications once in a while, but that can be handled by one of the emulators out there.
So I wouldn't say that Spelunky suffers from limited controller availability. Xbox 360 controllers are widespread, so it makes sense to support that, and everything in the game from installation to launching and playing can be done with the controller via Big Picture.
I will say that gamepads are 'more comfortable', but I will never say that they are 'better to use', because I just don't find that to be true for a 2D game like this.
Also, I beat Rogue Legacy and Super Meat Boy on a keyboard; nearly all achievements on both.