安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
I'm hoping the DLC will be Alucard DLC set sometime before LOS2.
As far as I'm concerned the DLC of LOS actually screwd up the ending.
They write in to canon that Gabriel's vampire transformation was just some random step of having to do something else?.. That TRULY sucked balls.
It totally castrated the entire vampire theme.
I liked it as a sort of "necessary evil". Seeing as how he would never allow it otherwise. He was put in the position to let it happen or watch the world burn by the Forgotten One. I loved Laura too so it didn't bother me :3
Cox also said that if they were going to make a DLC for LOS2 then they would avoid another "post-ending" dlc and would try to enrich the main narrative with a sidestory.
I'd actually agree with this, IF it weren't for the fact that the entire LOS2 wasn't about him being a vampire.. I just find that the justification for it boils down, effectively, to nothing... imo anyway.
"- Dracula ruling the World with no challengers? I think it's a fitting ending for the Prince of Darkness :-) "
I actually didn't have a problem with ME3's ending. It wasn't the best in the context of finishing Shepard's story, but at the same time on it's own it wasn't that bad. This ending is far too abstract and ambigious to even be CALLED an ending. It looks like the scene you see right before the actual ending shows