Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Trolls = waste of valuable time of both said trolls and thier target audience.
Still waiting for that "comet". Come up with something better than SRR and sell it to us. That would actually be something worth posting on Steam.
Trolls = waste of valuable time of both said trolls and thier target audience.
2. I only have the same complaints I always have had: Mostly about lack of content, no bang for the buck, too linear, broken functions (like hired deckers not activating spots). Things like that.
3. The purpose of this thread is to ask how people would rate this game if it did not have the Shadowrun name (or any existing franchise), to see how people would measure it without the biases or expectations associated with a big name.
I find the question hard to answer, personally. I wouldn't think very highly of it. Then again, I wouldn't have high expectations for things like cyberware, shamans, the matrix, metaplanes and everything else. I could see myself rating it lower OR higher.
If you are interested in answering the question of the thread, you are welcome to! Otherwise, you are just a troll showing anger and arrogance toward those who you don't agree with.
Instead of constantly making empty negative complaints, send constructive suggestions to the devs as they're pretty reasonable people. Unless for some reason it's easier to put others down than to help create something better. Up to you; but based on the behavior of haters thier "motivations" are becoming clearly unproductive.
Still waiting for that "comet". Come up with something better than SRR and sell it to us. That would actually be something worth posting on Steam.
Trolls = waste of valuable time of both said trolls and thier target audience.
You are incapable of having a normal conversation, and you are polluting my thread. If you have no honest answer to the question of the topic, BUTT OUT.
I would rate this game 1/10 without the editor. It gets a slightly below average rating though only because other players made it somewhat ok.
People need to stop being in denial, almost every other turn based game is more complex, balanced and well thought out than this game. The fact that the game went how long without the ability to save says how LAZY these developers were.
This game has been 450% funded and made with a larger team, and yet there are turn based games that don't use kickstarter or early access, and are only made by a few people yet STILL did more things right than this game. They at least had a save feature and took the time to give people a fully fleshed out campaign.
This game was rushed, too many KS games that people try to make within a year it's pretty sad.
I would give the developers the benefit of the doubt if this game had no funding and was made by 2 people during their free time.
Divinity despite being in such an early state, accomplished a lot more.
This game has been profitable to the developers, but hardly anyone even plays this game compared to almost every other turn based game on steam.
Still waiting for that. Come up with something better than SRR and sell it to us. That would actually be something worth posting on Steam.
Unless for some reason it's easier to put others down than to help create something better. Up to you; but based on the behavior of haters thier "motivations" are becoming clearly unproductive.
Trolls = waste of valuable time of both said trolls and thier target audience.
Sorry pal but the vast majority of games ARE better, Civilization V has 135 times more players on average.
This is one of the least popular turn based games available on steam, they suckered a lot of people in on launch then it died down.
Since you posted essentially another repeat of your last we will now go in circles.
Trolls = waste of valuable time of both said trolls and thier target audience.
He wants this thread closed because he is a hater who despises people who don't like the things he likes. Thus he uses copy-paste and red herring questions. He already defined himself as a troll multiple times. He doesn't even care to try to answer the question of the thread, which demonstrates the nature of his agenda.
Let the haters hate.
Sometimes the best questions to ask are the hardest ones. I personally struggle with "the perfect answer" so I am interested in the responses of everyone else, positive and negative. Surely a great game in a great franchise, will still be a great game without the franchise name, right? Final Fantasy 7 would have been a great game even if it wasn't related to Final Fantasy and the SNES Shadowrun would have been just as great even if it was Mario or Pac-Man RPG instead of Shadowrun.
Divinity almost made the same mistake, and mighty 9 might make this mistake also.
Would you rather get your shadowrun game within a year, or 2 years?
game development is being treated like a speedrun because the developers don't truly care about the quality.
You described the features of C. Wright Mill's "McDonaldization", and frankly, I agree.
If the game upon release were released in the form it is in now with most of the bugs fixed, typos corrected, and everything, how would you rate it?
In this instance, I would give it 3.5/5 with the feeling that the game wasn't broken but still lacking in general.
If this entire time, the game were released as a BETA and "Final Release" would be "Dragonfall" as release 1 (A game featuring 2 campaigns), how would you rate it?
In this instance I would give it 4/5 with a point deduction for being linear.
The character creation could've ended up with 100's of customizations, and a single campaign could've had the most ridiculous playability for a turn based game. But that's only in the scenario they didn't write the game off as "finished"
The best question to ask would be how good would this game be if it took an extra year before they even attempted a beta.
If I play a custom level on shadowrun I don't think "oh man shadowrun is so freaking amazing" I think "the person who made this level is amazing"
1 extra year is extremely underrated, you can make a game that's 2/10, into something that's 9/10 depending on how much potential it has.