Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
You'll lose some quests, but probably nothing important.
You have to pay higher prices in stores.
Good aligned NPCs will leave you forever.
Guards will attack on sight.
Bounty hunters will hunt you.
And you can't murder a shopkeeper and steal all his loot like Fallout...
You can always get your reputation back up by donating alot of gold to temples... Unless ofcourse you butcher everyone in the temples.
There's only a few people that you should definitely not attack...
Belt, Liia, Scar, Duke Eltan, and most people in Candlekeep.
You made me laugh so much :-) Thank you for that!
True Natural will be my pick then!
And, yeah it seems that the developers wanted the PC to be evil. Much better NPC selection. As a good PC, it's almost like your stuck with Khalid and Jaheira right from the start; and of course, Imoen. 4 party slots taken right there... then there's Minsc and Dynaheir.
but, there are no evil quests, so if you roleplay, you won t help people and have no reason to do the main story
but i still recommand it as BG has a lot of land to wander about
you can play evil in BG1, some good npcs put up a hell of a fight
you won t be able to play evil in BG 2 as all quests and maps are unlocked by helping nice good people
and if i remember correctly, he would catch on if you tried to sell him back the stuff you stole from him :)
wikipedia link[en.wikipedia.org]
Anyway, it is not like lawful good PCs don't unlock front doors and loot chests.
So it's either do the smart but good thing or the evil but stupid thing. Generally I go for the smart thing since I am a intelligent and lawful wizard. But that means my reputation goes up and technically, I'm playing as a good character would. I have to rationalize in my head to "remain evil". But in Baldur's gate reputation is both karma and reputation, so high reputation in the game means I have high karma which means my evil party members get pissed at me and will even leave if it goes too far. So I have to do something stupid evil, totally out of character for me, like, kill an innocent for no good reason just to lower my reputation.
Let me just say how incredibly stupid that system is. Why the hell would an evil character not want fame and fortune ie: high reputation? No, it is much better to be chased by guards and potentially killed /sarcasm. No, reputation and karma should be seperate, so high karma would make evil party members leave and complain while high reputation would not.
Also add to the fact that good characters recieve better rewards/xp than evil character because reasons.
Some quotes from the forums I agree with:
Lawful Evil: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/LawfulEvil
Stupid Evil: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/StupidEvil
Smart Evil imo: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/PragmaticVillainy