Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
토론 규칙 및 지침
게시글 신고
The regular price through steam is $29.95 with the discount it comes down to $22 somthing.
Go to Display Fusion's website and but it there for $25 straight up.
So in essence you can buy it as cheap without Steam forcing itself to run for this program to run.
Imange if you don't have a internet connection and Steam dosen't let Display Fusion run.
The $25 license on our site only allows for installation on a single machine, whereas the Steam license can be used on any machine that you primarily use, and use Steam on. Steam is required for the installation, but does not need to be running or online in order to use DisplayFusion after it's installed.
These types of features are actually NOT built into Windows, as you would know if you've ever used dual monitors. While I do believe the taskbar can be extended across multiple monitors, it will show ALL windows across all of your monitors. DisplayFusion allows for independent taskbars for each monitor. It also has extremely extensive customization options. Windows 7 did bring many new window management functions and wallpaper management options that did indeed make many features in DisplayFusion a bit redundant, but nonetheless they still offer their own advantages over Windows' default.
People are acting like they've somehow gotten ripped off, like this is a repeat of WarZ or something. Again, if you don't want it, don't buy it. There is no false advertising or bad business practices here.
As someone with three monitors and a TV attached to their computer, I can tell you that this program is capable of a level of organization that the NVidia software was not able to produce. Pricey for sure, but if you have a need for what this provides, rest assured it will solve your problem.
I would think saying its a waste of money when only owning one screen sounds a bit more reasonable.
For someone who has 4 monitors and many accessories and a tv connected to my pc ( i can live stream my set up right now , just saying ) i can definately see how this software could make daily tasks or multitasking alot easier but then again many are discussing the price point not the functioning aspects and imo the pirice is a bit high but thats just my useless opinion.
please dont say this is the price of a few happy meals because we as humans need food to survive.
These types of features are actually NOT built into Windows, as you would know if you've ever used dual monitors. While I do believe the taskbar can be extended across multiple monitors, it will show ALL windows across all of your monitors. DisplayFusion allows for independent taskbars for each monitor. It also has extremely extensive customization options. Windows 7 did bring many new window management functions and wallpaper management options that did indeed make many features in DisplayFusion a bit redundant, but nonetheless they still offer their own advantages over Windows' default.
People are acting like they've somehow gotten ripped off, like this is a repeat of WarZ or something. Again, if you don't want it, don't buy it. There is no false advertising or bad business practices here. [/quote]
I have 3 monitors, dual monitors were not enough for my work. When I purchased my Nvidia card it came with a whole toolset of options, much of them are included with this particular piece of software. I'm not sure what OS your using, but yes many of these features are included also with Windows 7 Ultimate x64/along with just about every other linux distro that's worth a damn. Do I need this? no just expressing an opinion on an un-needed and overpriced piece of software.
I just think it is over-priced. A useful utility that would sell ALOT more if it was £4-5.
It's priced at about 40% the price of Windows Home. I really don't think you can justify that by telling people they don't understand.
Going on my time with the app in the past, I value it at around $15 on the top end. That's how much it was worth to me at least. It's hard to justify 'worthy' value on what are essential back end utilities that provide functions that aren't actively used (like a game, or some productivity app). Even if what they provide is just as valid.