Installer Steam
connexion
|
langue
简体中文 (chinois simplifié)
繁體中文 (chinois traditionnel)
日本語 (japonais)
한국어 (coréen)
ไทย (thaï)
Български (bulgare)
Čeština (tchèque)
Dansk (danois)
Deutsch (allemand)
English (anglais)
Español - España (espagnol castillan)
Español - Latinoamérica (espagnol d'Amérique latine)
Ελληνικά (grec)
Italiano (italien)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonésien)
Magyar (hongrois)
Nederlands (néerlandais)
Norsk (norvégien)
Polski (polonais)
Português (portugais du Portugal)
Português - Brasil (portugais du Brésil)
Română (roumain)
Русский (russe)
Suomi (finnois)
Svenska (suédois)
Türkçe (turc)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamien)
Українська (ukrainien)
Signaler un problème de traduction
I'm not denying the publisher's money, but haven't they gotten enough over the decades? It just seems sometimes that they use the games and squeeze them until the last drop.
If it was cheaper, a lot of people who have actually never played it could enjoy it for the first time. For the price it is, most people with rather buy L4D2, the Killing Floor and etc.
PS: I did a quick search and it's still in some abandoneware sites such as myabandonware, abandonwaredos, abandongames and xtcabandonware. I don't know if it is legal hence I did not provide any links.
Keep in mind that these games were originally sold for $60 back in 1992. I don't think $3-$5 is asking too much for the game. The enjoyment to be had from the game is the same as it was back in the day. (Although with source ports now there's even more.) Better graphics doesn't make a better game.
By the way, it used to cost $60 more than 20 years ago. Think about how much money they have earned over the years. They earned their money already, let it go. Why couldn't they cheaper it up, since it's a classic? That's the problem: they are always trying to make the most money out of it.
Develop a new game and charge accordingly. That's my opinion.
This is what I mean, if they are going to charge this price.
Regarding wolfram, as someone involved in Doom and Wolf3D source ports, I've always found the high resolution and what not stuff to just be ugly. The original game art was designed to look well with the engine limitations, so just throwing lighting and high resolution textures on top of it loses the imagionary detail that the classic resources have. It is really rare that any of them are done "right," but to each his own.
I totally agree with the OP. Beats me how can one ask money for a 21 years old game.
However, I think they could polish it up a little. Maybe make a new sourceport, like the one available at the XBOX Live Arcade, which has achievements and so on? And why is there no Linux or Mac support? If the game is running on DOSBox, which runs natively on both systems, it should come for Linux and Mac users too.
So yeah. This is one of the first games I bought when I joined steam because it was worth it and owe it a lot. But it would be nice if the polished it up a little bit. Because claiming the game runs by itself is a disrespect to the people behind the DOSBox project who created the emulator.
Bethesda can do it, they already did for XBOX, so why not?
Any how, yeah I'm not sure why Valve hasn't included DOSBox with Steam and require all developers to use their version. There really is no excuse otherwise for the games not being available for Mac or Linux. Oh well, at least you can use Wine to download the files and run them natively with a source port.
There is a reason for this to be called a forum... it's a place for people to express their opinions and you should be at least inteligent enough to know that.
Some people agree and others don't, that is the purpose of a discussion.