Single-player only? No, thank you.

[aristides]

Comon guys. Sequel without co-op it's just so disappointing. Yeah the game is great and all that, but knowing that they lost this crazy opportunity is making me not buying this game. Third try maybe?

[Preserved Head]

I hate this new generation of gamer who likes a feature then arbitrarily decides that they DESERVE it in EVERY game that they play. This is a brilliant single player game that would not be greatly improved by co-op. The AI and bullet-dodging challenges are geared towards being challenging and fun for a single human player and the way the physics are so exaggerated would not work as well if there were two people interacting with the environment.

This guy hasn't thought the implications of multiplayer through AT ALL and it is not needed.

[Vahvi]

This isn't even a sequel. Yes it says 2 but all it really is is a complete version of Intrusion. First version http://www.kongregate.com/games/vapgames/intrusion

[faust.twi]

you won't believe. i don't buy multiplayer games because i hate multiplayer.

[BDO]

There are so many multiplayer games.

Thank you for making a good single-player game. Checking out the demo today.

[peter purvis]

... hey yeah, i'm a single-player gamer as well. I find it frustrating when developers are too lazy to bother with any AI and release games as multiplayer only. It takes talent and creativity to develop a good balanced and challenging SP game ...

[Bamboozly]

aristides님이 먼저 게시:

Comon guys. Sequel without co-op it's just so disappointing. Yeah the game is great and all that, but knowing that they lost this crazy opportunity is making me not buying this game. Third try maybe?

YOU ARE WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS WORLD

[netkot]

faust.twi님이 먼저 게시:

you won't believe. i don't buy multiplayer games because i hate multiplayer.

Brofist.

[ZeroSafe]

I love this game, and while I think it's not necessary for it to have multiplayer (I'm not some elitist tool who thinks they're entitled to having multiplayer in every game) I'd find it a neat feature, since this is one of those types of games that, if they do have multiplayer, it's incredibly fun to play with a friend.

[aristides]

The Gvidaz님이 먼저 게시:

YOU ARE WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS WORLD

So it's not al-qaeda then? Oh man i was really hoping to be at least the second in that list.

Updated the first post.

[Pickle Tickle Mode]

So you're saying a sequel needs to have multiplayer or co op to be good?
That's really stupid.

[aristides]

Uberwatch님이 먼저 게시:

So you're saying a sequel needs to have multiplayer or co op to be good?
That's really stupid.

You can't read can you? I'm saying this game is too good to be single-player.

[swagmoneybitchescocaine]

This is saying the game is too good? Please point that out.

aristides님이 먼저 게시:

Comon guys. Sequel without co-op it's just so disappointing. Yeah the game is great and all that, but knowing that they lost this crazy opportunity is making me not buying this game. Third try maybe?

[The Chyborg]

this game is really good with singleplayer. i'm not sure how multiplayer would go, although players fighting eachother inside mechs sound amazing.

[a powerful man]

al-queda are the good guys

[sabotabo]

Vahvi님이 먼저 게시:

This isn't even a sequel. Yes it says 2 but all it really is is a complete version of Intrusion. First version http://www.kongregate.com/games/vapgames/intrusion

Actually, it IS the next part of the story. It's consistent from the rocket at the end of the game.