Installer Steam
connexion
|
langue
简体中文 (chinois simplifié)
繁體中文 (chinois traditionnel)
日本語 (japonais)
한국어 (coréen)
ไทย (thaï)
Български (bulgare)
Čeština (tchèque)
Dansk (danois)
Deutsch (allemand)
English (anglais)
Español - España (espagnol castillan)
Español - Latinoamérica (espagnol d'Amérique latine)
Ελληνικά (grec)
Italiano (italien)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonésien)
Magyar (hongrois)
Nederlands (néerlandais)
Norsk (norvégien)
Polski (polonais)
Português (portugais du Portugal)
Português - Brasil (portugais du Brésil)
Română (roumain)
Русский (russe)
Suomi (finnois)
Svenska (suédois)
Türkçe (turc)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamien)
Українська (ukrainien)
Signaler un problème de traduction
Procédures à suivre et règles des discussions
Signaler ce message
Umad? Finally no more PvE addicts shooting robots 24/7 who influence the queue times.
Trolling aside, I want this one. Standing by to pre-order!
If Hi-Rez has shown us anything about the way they made GA, I expect that they will add PvE if enough people complain about it. Just as they changed everything upon release back when I bought this game in beta.
^ ?
Some people just would rather "shoot robots" than read, and put up with, some of the narrow minded chatter that goes on display in dealing with the majority of the pvp folk. I think Steady mentioned this, somewhere.
From a prior pvp guru, it would be nice to see a full pvp place for these pvp happy players to venture off to. ;)
Anticipating the rise of decent chat manners upon their departure. :P (if the shoe fits)
IAS: Would be great if they totally took out the pvp from GA, once GA2 is released, and expand on the storyline and more pve implementations. This, of course, with the hopes of the many coming true and hi-rez dev's get back on GA.
It's not the people that I dislike in PvP it's just PvP is not as interesting anymore as it was back in Doom, Unreal 1, Quake, ara. Again this is my opinion. At least with PvE it holds my interest longer than PvP does. Now with having both, my interest is kept even longer. Giving a game more life.
I guess the oddest thing is why a company, who is out to make money, would not try to maximize it's product by appeasing a wider customer base? Give people the choice. You don't like PvE, don't play it. You don't like PvP, don't play it. You like them both, play them both. To take out one will limit the amount of money that this product produces making it's lifespan shorter in the end.
There are tons of PVE MMOs out there. If you think that PVE is nice in here, you have no ideea of how it is in other games.
In GA you don't have the flexibility or many tactics to enhance your PVE experience compared to other PVE MMOS. That is why PVE should not be primary focus of the game (if you ask me, it sould not exist).
GA at it's release was an awesome PVP experience. PVE din't exist. They distroyed the AVA original concept, players started to quit the game, so they tried to revive the game with PVE. And here where it went... it;s a ghost town, not a MMO. If you want to play solo, there are tons of offline solo RPGs out there.
Also PvE was always in GA. I have been with them since closed beta back when the game cost you $60. To say PvE was never in GA, 'is' wrong. Again I am not trying to be offencive. I have just been here from the beginning. Now if you mean the open world stuff, yes that was added later. The mission PvE has always been in the game.
From the start, my agency and I has played more PvE than PvP. Again its more interesting than PvP 'to us'. Not that we don't play PvP, we just like having them both. Again I will state, to cut off the PvE players cuts the game's potential to make more money. Therefore making the game's lifespan not as long compared to if the devs make an accommodation for both sides. If you want GA and GA2 to become populated then wouldn't you want all players? Even if they like PvE, they might play PvP right?
Again I am not trying to be offencive. It's ok to not like PvE, but to say other's are wrong for liking the PvE GA offers will not get others to share your opinion. In fact most will look at these comments and see nothing but a fool. I am not saying you are a fool, I don't know you personally. I am just letting you know how you are coming across. I just would want someone to tell me the same thing if I was being offencive.
Secondly, a PvP game can be just as successful even without a PvE component. Or are you saying no one is playing CS or TF2?
I think the main issue with having a PvE component is like you're saying it yourself; "Even if they like PvE, they might play PvP right?". Fact is that most PvP players don't want people who don't like or care about PvP on their teams when they're trying to win.
To give an example: "most PvP players don't want people who don't like or care about PvP on their teams when they're trying to win." is your opinion. I am not saying you are wrong, just that I don't agree with you. I don't mind a good debate, I am greek. We love to debate. However I would never say you are wrong in an opinion. Everyone's personal experiences are different. So what you like and/or perceive might be different from my own experiences. There is no reason we can't both agree in facts and disagree in opinions, no?