Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
The game has changed a lot since those initial scores. It'd be rated much higher now.
I'm pretty sure that Spiral would not even consider making Dino Horde free to play because that's against their philosophy. There are also so many f2p games available that I wonder where they find people to play them all. (I wonder why someone would grind his way through a probably not that great game or buys a game bit by bit when there's sales and indie bundles that give us yesterdays awesome games for ridiculously little money.)
Now, with that out of the way, I'm curious about this guys reasoning: Does he want people to play a game that is as bad as the reviews claim or does he think the rating should be better? How would he expect Dino Horde to be f2p? A game where everything is available through extensive grinding? Does he believe a small studio like Spiral could exist from selling hats?)
And just because you (and maybe the people you know) do trust metacritic, that does not mean others do. Seriously: Either the game is as bad as it is rated or the rating platform is not trustworthy.
sorry to see you have no own opinion other than what metacritic tells you to have ..
amen!