войти
|
язык
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
English (английский)
Suomi (финский)
Français (французский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Magyar (венгерский)
Italiano (итальянский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
Español (испанский)
Svenska (шведский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
ไทย (тайский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Українська (украинский)
Помогите нам с переводом Steam
The Greenlight FAQ makes it clear they only are concerned with up-votes, because that shows interest in the product. To do otherwise would be dumb: if someone puts a RTS (which has a small community) on here and the FPS fans say "I'm not interested" (and there are many more of them) it doesn't negate the interest from the RTS fans in the game and if enough of them are interested the game... the game has a chance of being Greenlit.
Or, more succinctly, Greenlight is about potential customers, not those milling about the mall.
The voice of reason - Tau Ethereal
"No thank you" votes can not remove a project from greenlight, nor do projects get taken down by Valve after any lenght of time.
So I decided to take the other one down and start over.
I pay over $4,000 a year to Microsoft for the access I have. Meh.