安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The mechanisms can be complex and unreliable, which is the biggest disadvantage. And it could be really heavy and takes lots of space. About its weight, it counters heavy tail with rudder and elevator controls, which is not really a problem sometimes.
Variable pitch can be done using RTC(return to center) pistons or limited angle steering hinges.
The former has intuitive control, but the pistons may have to fight against centrifugal force causing it less effective. I made the mechanism on this plane more stable by not using any brace in the rotor.
The latter is compact and reliable, but it's hard to control the speed. A plane might pitch up or down at different speeds, so it'd be hard to keep the plane to cruise perfectly level.