Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
A Santi with 9 and 4lb mediums is now far more devastating than anything carrying bigger guns due to the insane gun rework and the reload times.
The game just became a bait-and-switch operation and it sucks now. I'd never have bought it if I knew they'd gut ballistics and make it so that guns' penetration INCREASES after a certain distance defying physics.
That's an interesting idea regarding elevation and angle of impact - it's certainly worth investigating although I imagine it would be difficult to quantify, as there are no direct in-game values for these parameters, and data derived from gameplay may introduce various uncontrolled variables such as ship heel, etc.
As for the crew requirements - the data was true at the point of the latest timestamp, which admittedly was a fair while ago. I've unfortunately not had as much free time as I used to and so haven't been able to update this for a while. If it's changed significantly, then perhaps the ratio you mention is closer, although I doubt the values would have changed that much!
Fair winds and good luck should you choose to look into elevation, etc.!