Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yes. But there is a correction possible: Replace Regular singals at the entry and exit points for stations with Chain signals.
It is a crucial design point that the outer rails are single-directional. This causes a train driving west to reach west, regardless of the train count driving east.
This is how the passing bays ought to be signalled: Rail in, chain out pairs at each end.
Two-direction bays ~ https://i.imgur.com/mF8tt0f.png
I used those blueprints in my world and got constant deadlocks when load increased. When, for some circumstances, 5 trains approach a pass-around (2 from left and 3 from right), the whole thing deadlocks. Building more pass-arounds does not solve this.
Removing the outer signals causes the 5th train to wait at the previous pass-around and therefore make it deadlock-free.