Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19QBYMB5dOLDbGSWq5HphA4aErMUKspPS?usp=sharing
There are many uncounted deaths/birth defects/illnesses caused by nuclear catastrophe that have gone unreported (Japan).
Nuclear development is often used as an excuse to build Nuclear weapons.
Producing anything necessitates fossil fuel emissions, unless the mining, manufacturing and transportation processes rely entirely on renewable energy. Nuclear reactors are especially costly if their construction is indefinitely delayed and their cost to build far exceeds expectations.
There is NO effective method for long term waste storage. Any storage solution leaks eventually, and WILL affect the environment in which it is stored. This is especially important when you consider global conflict/war and the fact that climate catastrophes will only get worse, making fragile storage solutions even more vulnerable.
Before you reply to me I recommend that you read the sources that I have provided.
Why wouldn't countries or terrorists create dirty bombs without nuclear reactors? How is ordinary uranium any less bad than nuclear waste? I fail to understand the role that nuclear reactors play in the whole thing?
Another power thing that makes me mad, at least from what I could see (I barely played the game), SOLAR PANELS TAKE UP SPACE in the game. They're like 3 bars of space out of 4 or something.
Yeah, they do take a space, if you're an idiot Californian who thinks that we need to have a dedicated farm of solar panels in the middle of the desert. But any reasonable person will just put it on roofs that aren't being used for other purposes. 0 space used.
They aren't stupid, they are evil. They can't say 'I hate human civilization because other people made it and it causes people to think highly of engineers, skilled workers and laborers' so they come up with a proxy. Thus the rationale is ever in motion and impervious to disproof, because the goal isn't to provide safe power, it is to have no one provide any power.
wind farms: destroys entire ecosystems for it to be placed, kills tens of thousands of birds anually. the fiberglass blades cannot be re-used and end up in landfills. all this to barely power up a neighbourhood
solar farms: better than wind farms but they also kill thousands of birds by setting them on fire and also need large plots of lands. not only that but they require metals and resources that destroy ecosystems (heavy metals, rare metals etc.) all of this to barely power a neighbourhood
hydro/thermo: good sources of renewable power and relatively safe, but cannot power the world.
coal/oil/gas: this is what powers most of the world and what REALLY causes global warming and destruction of ecosystems, these companies also own most of the wind and solar farms and create propaganda against nuclear power.
Of course, there is the issue of peak uranium to contend with, but it's a good stopgap for a few hundred years at least.