login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
To be honest, I'm trying to figure out the best way to present my "top ten" games, and my reviews as a whole!
I dislike Steam's recommendation system. I don't think whether a software is good or not is always black and white. I expect users to read my "Verdict", rather than relying on the thumbs up/down system. If I downvote a game and change my mind, I lose all upvotes, potentially destroying my review's viewership. Also, I "recommend" competent games. If a game is competent, I will usually "recommend" it. However, my "Verdict" is where I'll express my closest feelings towards purchasing it.
Long story short, I don't really use Steam's "recommend" system.
Still you recommend it. What the fuck Wombat. i really like your reviews and read them all but you are always recommending like almost everything. ?? even tho some of the games are trash. i didnt play this one but the cgis looks really bad