login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Help us translate Steam
To be honest, I'm trying to figure out the best way to present my "top ten" games, and my reviews as a whole!
I dislike Steam's recommendation system. I don't think whether a software is good or not is always black and white. I expect users to read my "Verdict", rather than relying on the thumbs up/down system. If I downvote a game and change my mind, I lose all upvotes, potentially destroying my review's viewership. Also, I "recommend" competent games. If a game is competent, I will usually "recommend" it. However, my "Verdict" is where I'll express my closest feelings towards purchasing it.
Long story short, I don't really use Steam's "recommend" system.
Still you recommend it. What the fuck Wombat. i really like your reviews and read them all but you are always recommending like almost everything. ?? even tho some of the games are trash. i didnt play this one but the cgis looks really bad