The average length of a penis varies from 5.1 to 5.9 inches. I went for 5.5 inches to be safe average for us here. The average radius from the core centre of the penis to the skin on the outside is .75 inches. From this we can roughly find the volume with pi times radius squared times height. This comes around as the average penis being .927 cubic inches. Next I found the volume of the average adult Male. I had to first find the average weight of a Male, which according to Alex Shlessingerman’s “The Physics FactBook” is 70kg or 154Ibs. Weight is found by multiplying the object mass by the force of gravity which is 9.81m/s.

Once we got this out of the way, the average mass of an adult Male is 71.4k/g. Then I found the volume by dividing this number by the average density of a human which according to Wikipedia is 95.8k/g per cubic meter cubed. The volume of an adult Male to be ~0.0072516316 cubic meters. Utilising the volume of the average penis I found earlier, .972, I get ~0.0001592828 meters cubed. This means the penis is ~2.19% of an adult Male’s volume. Assuming a lack of testosterone and Male hormones and an increase in female hormones makes a Male less Male or a female all together, balls ignored for ease, a trap is only ~2.19% homosexual.

The Police forced me to remove my 1.6 meter tall naked Statue of Rem from Re:Zero, because it was "Inappropriate" and "Not suitable for a publicly accessible location"

Making the Statue cost me $40.000 because of the Size and because it was customized.

The pose was great and everything looked so real. "It is a great work of art" I thought. "Place it in your garden" I thought. "It will look great" I thought.

Two days later Miss Jefferson from the other side of the Street calls the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Police because she assumes her kids could get "disturbed" and "traumatized"

THEY ARE 11 AND 14 KAREN! THEY PROBABLY ALREADY FAPPED TO IT WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING!!

I dont get it

Old naked statues by Greeks or Romans are considered art and People pay hundreds of dollars to go to Museums to see them, but when I place a Live Sized Hentai Figure in my garden the Neighbors are complaining.

What a strange world, we live in.

🚶‍♂️are you the👁👄👁new girl😜heh☺️ i thought so😌i’ve never seen👀 you before🤔 cone e chee wah ✋🏻 i’m alex-kun😚it’s so nice😛to finally meet you🤪you look just like😳my waifu🥵HEH👹HEH👹HEH👹HEH👹HEH👹HEH👹anyways😐i’m so sorry😔about the jerks😡in class😤theyre all👊🏻BAKA👊🏻they only want😭one thing😫not me🥴i just like🤓to watch📺my favourite anime😍jiu jitsu kaisen😍and read manga😎mmmalso👉🏻👈🏻ithinkyourereallycool😅kawaee desu neigh😳🐴HEH👹HEH👹HEH👹HEH👹HEH👹HEH👹nghuuh😣i’m sorry😤i’m just nervous😭okay😡it’s just😉well😋it’s just🥵mm I JUST WANT TO KNOW🤔IF I CAN SUCK👅ON YOUR NIPPLETS🤭OKAY❓well😰what do you 👊🏻👊🏻NNGGGH😵

In fact, it is much more abnormal to not be aroused by hentai, as hentai is the crystallization, the minimalistic arrangement of arousing qualities stripped of everything unnecessary. It is much more abnormal to not be aroused at these qualities that chosen specifically to arouse, than it is to be aroused at a random arrangement of genes transformed by random events through life. The same points also apply to virtual idols and singers such as Hatsune Miku and others like her. The inevitable impossibility of ever having physical contact with Hatsune Miku is no different from real singers; you as a normal person will most likely never touch her, the star.

Hentai is much more ethical than "normal", live-action porn. No human trafficking, no drug addictions, no STDs. Live-action porn is imperfect by definition; it stars humans, and one of the defining traits of humanity is imperfectness. Hentai, on the other hand, is much closer to perfection; it does not include any unwanted elements that are always present in people. Still the majority of people view hentai as sick or weird, even though it is much closer to perfection than live-action porn. The usual arguments against hentai are ones about the weirdness of being attracted and aroused at drawings. This is of no argumental value as it plays on the majority-ruled and zeitgeist dependent notion of "weirdness". What's weird is not universal; people of different cultural backgrounds may view things that other cultures do as sick or weird.