Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Bahasa Melayu (Malay) BETA
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem

11 Jul @ 2:43am
"Human eye can't see more than 20 fps, you people are craze if you're having issues with 30 fps cut scenes. At this point, you just want to complain about anything. Awful"
--
The idea that humans can’t perceive more than 20 FPS is a long‑debunked misconception and a myth from the CRT era. Human visual perception isn’t capped like a monitor refresh rate — we can detect differences in motion clarity, latency, and frame pacing well past 60 FPS. Modern studies, high‑refresh displays, and competitive esports all demonstrate that higher framerates produce measurably better reaction times and smoother motion. This isn’t controversial, just outdated info you are harboring from a almost 2-3 decades ago.