Since when is knowing that Moon Studios can do better a bad thing to point out.

---

Even the CEO has come in and replied to the video thanking the uploader for the feedback
(The uploader also left a pinned comment stating that their issues have also been resolved as of Hotfix #4)

https://youtu.be/ksYe8kSCvko?si=YkkdLNExC13t7JhZ

---

As far as I've come to understand things the CEO has realized the issues of releasing an update in the state that The Breach did and has vowed to do better in future updates.

-and as far as I've come to witness, he is following through and taking greater care in releasing each update rather than rush to get some last-minute changes in without properly testing them.

Yes, I get it, Early Access will mean there will be issues and that much is obvious to anyone that actively plays these kinds of games.

The problem I have with that mentality is that it's an excuse, a shield even, to hide behind and wave off any valid criticism that may be had.

The more things are hand-waved away as EA woes the more it allows the quality to drop in the end or worse-yet leave issues to fester down the line and making it more difficult to correct at that later point.

Making what would otherwise be an easy fix to do early on become a nightmare to correct later, it's happened to quite a lot of Early Access games and this was one of those that I wasn't wanting to have that be its fate.

From what I've read in Hotfix #4, Patch 1, and Hotfix #5 almost all my issues have been resolved with the game and then-some. (With others that haven't been mentioned being, hopefully, issues with my specific game instillation which I've since done a full re-install of the game)

I look forward to anything else that may come for the game down the line, but I'm never going to let up on pointing out any grievance that I have with the game because I truly and fully want this game to succeed in the end.

As my other iterations of this review pointed out: Even the CEO admitted, and apologized, for the state that The Breach released in and has agreed with many of the issues that players were pointing out was an issue with the game.

Which, as I've also mentioned, was my starting point for the game so my experienced was highly soured with my first steps because of how rough the experience was from performance to gameplay.

Here's to that restart on my playthrough going a lot smoother than the first time around.

[h1]Early Access isn't an excuse to ignore the shortcomings of the game, that's the entire point of Early Access. It is to iron out these flaws and rough edges to get it to the best state it can be for 1.0 and beyond[/h1] [i]Since when is knowing that Moon Studios can do better a bad thing to point out.[/i] [hr][/hr] [h3]Was shown this video that covers all of my gameplay related issues but is worded in a better manner:[/h3] [i]Even the CEO has come in and replied to the video thanking the uploader for the feedback[/i] [i](The uploader also left a pinned comment stating that their issues have also been resolved as of Hotfix #4)[/i] https://youtu.be/ksYe8kSCvko?si=YkkdLNExC13t7JhZ [hr][/hr] [h2]While I haven't had the time to sit down and play, from the start, the update myself [i](As I do want to see just how many of my issues have been resolved)[/i] I will go through with my promise and change this review to a positive one.[/h2] As far as I've come to understand things the CEO has realized the issues of releasing an update in the state that [b]The Breach[/b] did and has vowed to do better in future updates. -and as far as I've come to witness, he is following through and taking greater care in releasing each update rather than rush to get some last-minute changes in without properly testing them. Yes, I get it, [b]Early Access[/b] will mean there will be issues and that much is obvious to anyone that actively plays these kinds of games. The problem I have with that mentality is that it's an excuse, a shield even, to hide behind and wave off any valid criticism that may be had. The more things are hand-waved away as [b]EA[/b] woes the more it allows the quality to drop in the end or worse-yet leave issues to fester down the line and making it more difficult to correct at that later point. Making what would otherwise be an easy fix to do early on become a nightmare to correct later, it's happened to quite a lot of [b]Early Access[/b] games and this was one of those that I wasn't wanting to have that be its fate. From what I've read in [b]Hotfix #4[/b], [b]Patch 1[/b], and [b]Hotfix #5[/b] almost all my issues have been resolved with the game and then-some. [i](With others that haven't been mentioned being, hopefully, issues with my specific game instillation which I've since done a full re-install of the game)[/i] I look forward to anything else that may come for the game down the line, but I'm never going to let up on pointing out any grievance that I have with the game because I truly and fully want this game to succeed in the end. As my other iterations of this review pointed out: Even the CEO admitted, and apologized, for the state that [b]The Breach[/b] released in and has agreed with many of the issues that players were pointing out was an issue with the game. Which, as I've also mentioned, was my starting point for the game so my experienced was highly soured with my first steps because of how rough the experience was from performance to gameplay. Here's to that restart on my playthrough going a lot smoother than the first time around.