Installer Steam
Logg inn
|
språk
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (tradisjonell kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tsjekkisk)
Dansk (dansk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spania)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latin-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (gresk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (nederlandsk)
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasil)
Română (rumensk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et problem med oversettelse
I'm honestly baffled, ZOC and related stuff is really with us since forever. I.e even floppy-disk games like Savage Frontier and Buck Rogers had them at the time. The computers got like a million times faster since, so claiming drag on the AI is something fishy.
It's okay, we see that there is audience for dumbed down combat systems, maybe more than for sophisticated ones, but how about being forward with it and let the buyer chose.
Overwise you make a strong case Midnight old buddy. Still, considering the provocation and overall context, IMO the dev is still awesome .
I guess it might seem unfair that the dev is well regarded by so many gamers despite all the below? Ok, yet the world has many much more consequential injustices. You're obvoiusly talented at marshalling and presenting evidence. Maybe better than some professionals I've seen in the policy making world. A shame to see such talent squandered in attacking a helpful and hard working dev!
The dev of this game is a man of rare honour and honesty. And maybe the most helpful dev on all of steam. Honest to a fault if anything – if he handled negative reviews based on the PR playbook, like most devs do, he'd sell slightly more games. (Though to be fair, allmost all the sales damage here was obviously done by a professional quality negative with over harsh wording landing on a game only a few days after release.)
The dev is no cash grabber, he puts his heart and soul in his games. Any with artistic sensitivity can see this, its why many of us love his games so much. So yeah, the dev does sometimes get a little passionate when responding to what he sees as unfair, thoughtless, or trolling type criticism.
Might even be a good thing for negative reviewers to get some honest feedback on the harm their nonsense can do. Of course, that only applies to the relatively decent ones. Almost impossible to change a hater or a troll!
While some negative reviews may be honest , a great many are made by haters. Any fool knows this. On average, a negative review is less likely to be honest than a positive. Even Amazon has been known to mass delete negative reviews when they suspect they're the product of a hate campaign.
So, I always ignore the positive reviews as they tell me nothing, but reading the negative reviews tell me all I need to know. To illustrate, many of my beloved games I bought off the back of negative reviews. One man's trash is another man's treasure and nowhere is this more true than in gaming.
That said, this developer is a wet and rotting carpet, discarded in a swampy ditch by people who couldn't care less. I will not buy anything from him, even if it would see him fed for one day. Some people are just not worth it.
I always like to view both the positive and negative before purchasing and obviously anything with 100 comments deserves a closer look.
I decided to see if this review was a one-off by looking over the neg reviews in the other Age of Fear titles and it seems this dev likes to tamper with neg reviews (flagging them, asking reviewers to modify or remove them, making accusations against neg reviewers, deleting comments in hindsight, etc).
@dev By messing with so many of the negative reviews you've made it virtually impossible to trust ANY review of your games as we don't know how much you've skewed things. Lacking that sort of trust is an automatic "NO" from me, even though it's currently on sale.
Negative reviews like this are very useful for people like me, who are interested in some types of games, but have been burned before by games with high reviews that end up completely unenjoyable because of certain things or mechanics.
But regardless of any of that, the developer's claim that somehow someone's review or actions made them increase the price of their game is laughable and makes me seriously question the real motives behind anything they may say.
Anyway,
@Midnight: Your post wasn't clear to me at first that you're referencing this game. When I saw your image I thought it was for a review elsewhere and you were just being punitive by crossposting it here. Then I realized Lester updated this thread!
But I can't say I blame him for trying to defend himself, being an indie dev working on a passion project is hard work and the pay sucks. I would have chosen a more tactful approach however. Still, being undiplomatic defending your hard work is not the worst sin in the world. Take the high road here and remember whoever else worked on this project with him probably grinds their teeth to dust every time he says something out loud.
Finally, based on the Dev's response... no way I am supporting this guy. Movin on.
Even after taking a look in the forums it doesn´t seem like the dev wants his game improved so, perhaps the next game in the series proves humble behavior.