109 osob ohodnotilo tuto recenzi jako užitečnou
72 osob ohodnotilo tuto recenzi jako vtipnou
Nedoporučuji
0.0 hodin za poslední dva týdny / 1.0 hodin celkem
Odeslána: 11. srp. 2014 v 21.22

"Only If"?
Pfft, As If!

This game tries too hard to be pseudo-philosophical while being "unpredictable" and "mysterious", but it just ends up with a badly voice-acted jumble of arbitrary, mundane, tasks with cheap, unexplained, hazards.

By no means is this a Puzzle Game, unless you like to play puzzles in the dark, with half of the pieces from five different jigsaws mixed into one, while a drunken philosophy dropout reads Plato's "The Allegory of the Cave" backwards, in a room slowly filling with carbon monoxide.
Byla tato recenze užitečná? Ano Ne Vtipná Ocenit
Počet komentářů: 7
Faudraline 8. led. 2016 v 17.10 
Wow, that is the most imaginative and accurate definition of this game that I could ever think. Bravo!
Ari 7. úno. 2015 v 5.26 
creability you dont know how to play XD
Dorgarr 24. led. 2015 v 20.39 
Psuedo-philosophy could describe an avant-garde form of philosophy. If I wanted to explain a philosophical concept in a different way to how such a concept is typically explained, one might say that I am aspiring to be psuedo-philosophical.


And let's say you're right, wouldn't it be axiomatic to call my review Psuedo-philosophical? What if I intended it to be?
Sixth Dimension 24. led. 2015 v 1.58 
One doesn't try to be 'psuedo-philosophical' - that is a result of attempting to be 'philosophical' and failing. If you are going to attempt to sound intelligent by knowing the name of a metaphor presented by Plato, I suggest you get a grasp of the concepts and language you are using to convey the message. Psuedo-intellectual review.
JorgeArtware 18. led. 2015 v 3.27 
Your "bad" review makes me want to play this game, hmmm...
Dorgarr 17. srp. 2014 v 13.42 
Haha thanks!
Fromfame  [vývojář] 17. srp. 2014 v 9.22 
Well said!