Εγκατάσταση Steam
Σύνδεση
|
Γλώσσα
简体中文 (Απλοποιημένα κινεζικά)
繁體中文 (Παραδοσιακά κινεζικά)
日本語 (Ιαπωνικά)
한국어 (Κορεατικά)
ไทย (Ταϊλανδικά)
Български (Βουλγαρικά)
Čeština (Τσεχικά)
Dansk (Δανικά)
Deutsch (Γερμανικά)
English (Αγγλικά)
Español – España (Ισπανικά – Ισπανία)
Español – Latinoamérica (Ισπανικά – Λατινική Αμερική)
Français (Γαλλικά)
Italiano (Ιταλικά)
Bahasa Indonesia (Ινδονησιακά)
Magyar (Ουγγρικά)
Nederlands (Ολλανδικά)
Norsk (Νορβηγικά)
Polski (Πολωνικά)
Português (Πορτογαλικά – Πορτογαλία)
Português – Brasil (Πορτογαλικά – Βραζιλία)
Română (Ρουμανικά)
Русский (Ρωσικά)
Suomi (Φινλανδικά)
Svenska (Σουηδικά)
Türkçe (Τουρκικά)
Tiếng Việt (Βιετναμικά)
Українська (Ουκρανικά)
Αναφορά προβλήματος μετάφρασης
Of course, if you were to go beyond the PC, there are tons of JRPGs which match the "blobber with turn-based combat" model, whether their exploration is top-down, third-person or first-person.
Feel free to correct any mistakes or oversights.
Like the PlayStation?
Like Crime Crackers?
So abstraction of combat and not necessarily of exploration? Like Dragon Quest 3 or Mother 2? Possibly Phantasy Star 1? Or outside Japan, Lords of Xulima? Warriors of the Eternal Sun is a partial blobber, but it's not quite the same. And Albion is like PS1 but with third-person combat, right? Can you name such a partial blobber with free movement during the first-person abstraction? I'd be interested in hearing of such.
I also sorted the categories better. More in line with my preferences. Maybe I should start an off-shoot group.
So I guess you're including games with free movement but it still has to be in first-person, 3rd-person and top-down/isometric are excluded? Sometimes I get confused as to how people define a "blobber".
Similar logic, how is gridder (American football player) necessarily first-person? Shouldn't, at least, Rogue, Eschalon, and Chip's Challenge be gridders? Possibly Bomberman. Might want to draw the line at grid-based tactical turned based games. So like grid unit by grid unit traversal games and not Dungeons & Dragons Tactics (grid-based exploration and combat tactical rpg.) That seems useful.
If Mapping's important, shouldn't it be called like hack & map or something? We could also distinguish free-movement and gridlocked blobbers cutely with terms like oozer and cuber (respectively) or something. (Might be too dandycentric.) Maybe globber for multi-party/split-party "blobbers." Little *nix humor there.
Why this much though on genre naming? I find it's like an esoteric blue-green distinction problem.
As for your video, if I get it right, it's not something available to play?
https://store.steampowered.com/app/908360/Monomyth/
Also, do it right and mention the kickstarter: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/836367155/monomyth/
Technically, but that's not far off from saying Baldur's Gate has a turn-based mode—auto-pause: end of round. It's called continuous phase-based (not real-time) for a reason. Wizards and Warriors does a hybrid thing, where the world is still real-time when you're locked in turn-based combat. It's just weird and awkward, and should probably be put in the real-time box...
Bah, I need to update the list anyway. And fix the spreadsheet link... Feh, I'll probably have to move it.