Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Platforms are not liable for what is posted on their service because of protections in Section 230.
The current loophole are platforms are allowed to censor anything they want even though they are not liable for what is posted there.
This loophole has been slated to be addressed by the Trump administration.
Communication services will likely have to decide if they are a publisher with the need to censor or a platform with the protections of Section 230.
They'll no longer be both.
This is a great summary and gives a glimpse of comments being removed from a lot of social media.
If YouTube bears potential liability for the things it's users post then it will quickly remove their ability to do so.
Trump just happens to spew a lot of that disinformation and therefore got censored accordingly.
If YouTube wishes to become a publisher with the need for censorship, then they are liable for everything posted on their service.
But they will blame Trump.