Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem



Honestly, if you want to do production work, you bought an awful chip gir it as the 12th gen is a bit of a dumpster fire.
There's a bit more nuance to TDP than you might realize. The TDP Intel often states is based on the base lock, not the turbo boost clock.
The reality is no one cares about the base clock, we just get big ass coolers and that can run the CPU at max turbo boost nigh indefinitely. And the power draw at max turbo boost is naturally much higher than base clock.
Disable Turbo Boost, and you'll be a lot closer to 65 watts I'm sure. But you probably don't want to give up that performance either because your expectations about power usage weren't met.
at idle or light load it will be under the rated tdp, but at full load it will be about 2x the rated tdp
cinebench is an unrealistic workload, the cpu will very rarely be at that kind of load even with more demanding real world jobs
you cant change it, its how the cpu works
as long as the board can deliver the power needed, its fine
130+w cpus were not uncommon even 10+ years ago
fx9 was 220w, i7 920-970 were 130w
12900k appears to be rated more correctly
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/134599/intel-core-i912900k-processor-30m-cache-up-to-5-20-ghz.html
Processor Base Power = 125 W
Maximum Turbo Power = 241 W
Anyone has good tested values of voltage for i9-11900 ? If i limit the clock to 4.6GHz would be fine
they have good guides on most cpus
AMD's TDP is based on thermal watts and not power draw at all; their 65W Ryzen CPUs have a stock power draw limit of 88W from the socket, their 105W CPUs have a stock limit of 142W.
So let this be a lesson learned: TDP doesn't mean anything. Companies have their own definitions and calculations for TDP, and since they don't ever line up properly, it means nothing.
I was just adding that the actual power use could possibly be higher than the 88W you stated, further supporting the notion that TDP often isn't an accurate measure of wattage used.
PPT = total power the CPU can draw from the socket
TDC = sustained current limit (long term, thermally constrained)
EDC = peak current limit (short term, electrically constrained)
I just noticed in HWMonitor (which is one reference point) that if I leave it open in the background, after a day of use, I tend to see the combined power draw of the cores at 88W and the total CPU watts anywhere between 100W and 125W, so based on that I was thinking maybe the 88W "limit" was for the cores themselves and the SoC as a whole might be able to go higher, but I'm not sure.