Roy (Kitiltva) 2018. febr. 20., 20:16
24inch vs 27inch monitor for 4k
https://www.amazon.com/LG-24UD58-B-24-Inch-Monitor-FreeSync/dp/B01LPNKFK0
$300

https://www.amazon.com/LG-27UD68-P-27-Inch-Monitor-FreeSync/dp/B01CH9ZTI4
$496

Does 24inch good for 4k? I have 22inch 1080p monitor now and i think its quite big enough
< >
3133/33 megjegyzés mutatása
Less than 27 inches, doesn't make 4K UltraHD even worth your while. Those are rubbish glimmick monitors, with slow gaming performance. Ideally, for retina display even 32 inches+ is more ideal. 27 inches would be retina @ 1440p or 1600p resolution and run much better gaming performance at higher Hz refresh rate / response time.

This would be much more ideal gaming performance at that resolution:
https://www.amazon.com/PG279Q-2560x1440-G-SYNC-Gaming-Monitor/dp/B017EVR2VM/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1519444525&sr=1-1&keywords=ASUS+ROG+Swift+PG279Q

However, what graphics card are you using?
(that monitor would be ideal with Nvidia GTX 980 or better as it's G-SYNC, FreeSync on the other hand is for AMD graphic cards)
Legutóbb szerkesztette: Azza ☠; 2018. febr. 23., 19:59
The bigger the screen the better. That's all that needs to be said about this, really.
Astro_80 eredeti hozzászólása:
The bigger the screen the better. That's all that needs to be said about this, really.

not really 4K 65" is worse pciture quality then FHD 32". Not by much but still worse. The Screen is just bigger. If you look into picture quality you want to look at PPI so unless you want to go big screens like 43" upwards.
However 32" is a good size for 4K. On the other hand there ppl that go for 4K screen cellphones. And they do believe they can see a difference between QHD and UHD on 5.2"...
< >
3133/33 megjegyzés mutatása
Laponként: 1530 50

Közzétéve: 2018. febr. 20., 20:16
Hozzászólások: 33