Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
They already allow developers that had been banned on Steam for pumping out spam games.
At this point, who cares if indie devs take the payday.
Healthy competition is always good.
As far as i read a few weeks ago....epic offers developers a partly/full reduction on the licensing fees for the UE if they make their game (time) exclusiv to the epic store, instead of paying them for exclusivity.
Epic could theoretically strong arm indie dev to make their games only available on EGS if they want to use UE.
It's almost an offer they can't refuse st that point.
That's the concern here.
You'd find many would just use Unity or other lesser known engines in that case. What your describing is a far worse scenario then what Unity is doing.
By that rationale Unity isn’t all that dead, is it?
Twenty cents per initial install isnt going to break anyone.
Compared to that, being confined to EGS on PC platform only, would still feels like surefire paradise.
Paying 20 cents per install is better then losing access to 90% of your market. Aferall they can't install a game if it didn't sell in the first place. Also again, what your describing would make EPIC more hated then Unity and just make the dev's go back to Unity vs Unreal.