Why so much blood if don't have dismemberment?

[󠀡]

I wanted to understand... Why a game released in 2017 has so much blood and no body dismemberment, I have older games released before 2017 that have dismemberment and the same amount of blood and what I don't understand is like a games company with a wonderful development team from ubisoft had the idea to put that amount of blood into a game but forgets to put body dismemberment and the same happens in AC: Odyssey, and I must say after several hours of playing this game with using swords, axes and scythes, I feel like I'm equipped with a metal baseball bat hitting vases filled with red paint... Anyway, I ended up disabling the blood of the game because it's ridiculous to keep it turned on in a game without dismemberment, and I know that ubisoft implemented this in Valhalla, but I won't buy Valhalla anytime soon because it took me a long time to think if I would buy the Origins because of these details and the price, but I say I don't really regret alot buying AC: Origins I just regret it a little, but that's okay.


nulla è reale tutto è lecito

[asheer150]

play mortal kombat

[asheer150]

If there was dismemberment, it would be appicable to both sides, and Bayek wouldn't be able to climb buildings. If enemies became dismembered, they wouldn't be able to attack you, game would be more easy. I think the game is fine as it is.

[󠀡]

Originally posted by asheer150:

If there was dismemberment, it would be appicable to both sides, and Bayek wouldn't be able to climb buildings. If enemies became dismembered, they wouldn't be able to attack you, game would be more easy. I think the game is fine as it is.

MEH!! So my dear friend, if it wasn't possible, they wouldn't have implemented it in Valhalla... Valhalla uses same graphic engine and same character models, beholds your logic doesn't make sense at this point.

[󠀡]

Originally posted by asheer150:

play mortal kombat

If I wanted to play fighting games like mk or sf I wouldn't have bought open world game with a combat system.

[asheer150]

So in Valhalla, you can lose limbs and run around?

[asheer150]

If you meant head decapitation, like in Vahalla I guess Vikings were of that nature. Since the game was made by a multicultural team with various ideas and beliefs, and in a historical setting, Perhaps limb dismemberment wasn't egyptian style. Egyptians were more into torture and that stuff maybe?

[asheer150]

No offence but these types of games progress slowly. Example In AC 1, you could not swim, in AC 2 you could etc. Parkour evolved in the game slowly as well (Before you couldn't climb trees. AC rogue was like AC 4 2.0. etc. if you get my drift.

I cannot remeber any assassins creed game before Valhalla that had limb disemberment? Am I wrong?

AC Valhalla was released after AC Origins and Odyessy right? So gradual improvements occur game after game in a series like AC. Anyway when you buy Valhalla, hope you are satified heard its a great game. :)

[asheer150]

Bayek was angry enough as it is. And he did lose a finger when he tried to assassinate one of his targets. lol.

[asheer150]

I don't know I don't think its suits the theme of the game. Its fine as it is. Vikings on other hand were known for their ferocity.

[󠀡]

Originally posted by asheer150:

No offence but these types of games progress slowly. Example In AC 1, you could not swim, in AC 2 you could etc. Parkour evolved in the game slowly as well (Before you couldn't climb trees. AC rogue was like AC 4 2.0. etc. if you get my drift.

I cannot remeber any assassins creed game before Valhalla that had limb disemberment? Am I wrong?

AC Valhalla was released after AC Origins and Odyessy right? So gradual improvements occur game after game in a series like AC. Anyway when you buy Valhalla, hope you are satified heard its a great game. :)

It offended a lot from the moment you said all these things without understanding what I said, and if you play the three games in question and compare the finishing moves after you finish killing an enemy, you'll notice that in Valhalla there are dismemberments the same as happens in the "for honor" you will understand that this would be something that it would not make sense to keep turned off in the game since the finishing moves to dismember exist but do not have the desired effect.

[󠀡]

Originally posted by asheer150:

I don't know I don't think its suits the theme of the game. Its fine as it is. Vikings on other hand were known for their ferocity.

You might think that "I don't think its suits the theme of the game" but if they didn't want to give that impression they wouldn't have put the dismember finishing moves into origins and odyssey.

[󠀡]

Originally posted by asheer150:

So in Valhalla, you can lose limbs and run around?

Hey let's stop there, but what a crude question was that? I was hoping to discuss this with someone smart who understands game development and who also realized that it doesn't make sense to make a game with finishing moves for dismemberment with a lot of gore but without the expected effect.

[asheer150]

Alright I am sorry i offended you, that was not my goal. To each his own, lets leave it at that.

[asheer150]

But I still don't understand, there were no dismember finishing moves in Odyssey and Origins. What are you talking about?

Originally posted by 󠀡:

Originally posted by asheer150:

I don't know I don't think its suits the theme of the game. Its fine as it is. Vikings on other hand were known for their ferocity.

You might think that "I don't think its suits the theme of the game" but if they didn't want to give that impression they wouldn't have put the dismember finishing moves into origins and odyssey.

[asheer150]

As I said before game development occurs in stages, you cant bulk all features in one game, as every game in the series progresses, it gets better, new gameplay is introduced. AC origins was the first in the triology to have a point system and rpg like elements( AC origins then odyssey then valhalla). You get what I am saying right?