登入
|
語言
Български（保加利亞文）
čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
English（英文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Français（法文）
Deutsch（德文）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Italiano（義大利文）
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
簡體中文
Español（西班牙文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
ไทย（泰文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
幫助我們翻譯 Steam
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉這篇留言
Personally though, I prefer survival, because it only requires 4 players (myself included) so there are less variables that can ruin the game experience. eg. team imbalances and people leaving (through rage quitting or getting kicked). Which is one of the main problems I have with versus as it upsets the overall flow of the game.
And secondly I prefer survival over other cooperative gamemodes purely because it provides a higher level of intensity compared to campaign with more SI, tanks and CI.
Although if we're to take community mutations into account as well my friend's survival mutation Hard20 is probably my favourite gamemode, because it offers an even higher spawn rate for infected than vanilla survival. Effectively increasing the intensity and shortening the length of rounds, so you end up with quick and exciting rounds compared to long, drawn out rounds that can happen once you reach a certain level of skill in vanilla survival.
Id host my own local server and force sv-cheats 0 to kill unlimited ammo.
After 150 bullets theyd toss the m60 and be forced to finish an expert round with nothing but magnum.
Good Times.