Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
HEY!!!! thats what im thinking all the time ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ true.....
Huh? What settings are you running at if you're getting less than acceptable frame rates?
I just finished my i5 4670K, 8 gigs of DDR 1600, on a SATA III SSD with a GTX 560 new build. Running the game at 1280x800 with medium settings and getting a disgusting 120 FPS minimum, even end game. Beginning of the game I'm hitting over 170 FPS.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=187115004
Graphics card doesn't seem to be a big deal for this game as long as it's not total garbage. It's the CPU that counts.
I'm using the exact same GPU as my old build, but went from a 2.98 Core 2 Dual to a 3.4 i5 4670K and I bagged a 130 more frames at a more graphically intensive setting.
You sure you've got some ? With this config ? => Omg !
Start wondering what's wrong within your PC before attacking the game, thanks ;)
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=187964367
That's after I upped my resolution and increased graphical settings.
1680 x 1050
Not 200FPS, but 80 FPS is plenty good.
I was getting 170~200 on everything off 1200x800.
I never said there weren't problems. And I have argued that the game suffers from a huge performance gap between high end systems and midrange (per their specs) systems to the point where it's a fair amount of pay to win. People willing to drop the money on the top line AMD, i5 and i7s will get significantly more frames than people on older dual cores. The fact that I just got an i5 4670K and it bags another 130 FPS from my Core 2 Dual just reinforces my position that performance on midrange systems is a real problem and likely the #1 reason why people don't stay.
Post a screenshot so we can see what resolution and settings you're using.