Transport Fever

Transport Fever

View Stats:
DaveKap Nov 8, 2016 @ 10:41pm
Does this game actually have the ability to run at 60fps?
I've got a pretty beefy computer but it feels like it's locked at 30.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 21 comments
Crazybmanp Nov 8, 2016 @ 11:14pm 
does 60 fps matter in a top down management game?
TheHiding Nov 8, 2016 @ 11:14pm 
Not that it is good, but I'm pretty sure I am getting 35. So I don't think it is locked at 30. I'll double check next time i play.
DaveKap Nov 8, 2016 @ 11:16pm 
Originally posted by Mom's Spaghetti:
does 60 fps matter in a top down management game?
Have you not tried train-view yet? It's pretty sweet!
TheHiding Nov 9, 2016 @ 12:36am 
Originally posted by TheHiding:
Not that it is good, but I'm pretty sure I am getting 35. So I don't think it is locked at 30. I'll double check next time i play.
Yeah, I'm actually getting upto 40 fps with a rx480. Still not what it should be, but not capped.
hodderd Nov 9, 2016 @ 12:40am 
Using Fraps mine goes from 7 to 60 fps, the 7 fps being year end. Generally 20 -40
DaveKap Nov 9, 2016 @ 12:42am 
Thanks, guess it's just a heavy game!
Devilhunter Nov 9, 2016 @ 12:45am 
GTX 560Ti + i5 2500. FPS up to 60. Most of time 30-40. BUT! GPU is loaded by 30-35%, CPU - also around 35%. It's weird.
Hiigara Nov 9, 2016 @ 1:19am 
55 - 60 fps all the time:
I7-4790K @ 4,6 ghz // 16 GB Corsair Platnium 2400 DDR3 // Asus GTX 980ti // Windows 7 64 bit // Game installed on Samsung SSD 500 GB pro
Last edited by Hiigara; Nov 9, 2016 @ 1:19am
Devilhunter Nov 9, 2016 @ 1:25am 
Originally posted by Sheep:
55 - 60 fps all the time:
I7-4790K @ 4,6 ghz // 16 GB Corsair Platnium 2400 DDR3 // Asus GTX 980ti // Windows 7 64 bit // Game installed on Samsung SSD 500 GB pro
What is level of GPU and CPU usage?
Last edited by Devilhunter; Nov 9, 2016 @ 1:25am
The3hadow Nov 9, 2016 @ 1:27am 
Originally posted by Devilhunter:
GTX 560Ti + i5 2500. FPS up to 60. Most of time 30-40. BUT! GPU is loaded by 30-35%, CPU - also around 35%. It's weird.

Yeah I also have the feeling that the game somehow doesn't use the full potential of the hardware. Kinda strange.
Last edited by The3hadow; Nov 9, 2016 @ 1:36am
Crazybmanp Nov 9, 2016 @ 1:31am 
Originally posted by The3hadow:
Originally posted by Devilhunter:
GTX 560Ti + i5 2500. FPS up to 60. Most of time 30-40. BUT! GPU is loaded by 30-35%, CPU - also around 35%. It's weird.

Yeah I also have the feeling that the game somehow doesn't use the full potential of the hardware. Kinda strange and it makes the game very laggy.
have anything to back that up at all?
OutLoud Nov 9, 2016 @ 1:31am 
Originally posted by The3hadow:
Originally posted by Devilhunter:
GTX 560Ti + i5 2500. FPS up to 60. Most of time 30-40. BUT! GPU is loaded by 30-35%, CPU - also around 35%. It's weird.

Yeah I also have the feeling that the game somehow doesn't use the full potential of the hardware. Kinda strange and it makes the game very laggy.

It doesn't unfortunately, it makes practically no use of different CPU cores: http://i.imgur.com/EC2j4gh.png
Because of this the CPU core that is actually used is a huge bottleneck and the graphics card and other CPU cores will just idle around and you still get low FPS.

I've only checked during America Campaign 2, but it's gonna be like this always I guess :/
Crazybmanp Nov 9, 2016 @ 1:36am 
Originally posted by OutLoud:
Originally posted by The3hadow:

Yeah I also have the feeling that the game somehow doesn't use the full potential of the hardware. Kinda strange and it makes the game very laggy.

It doesn't unfortunately, it makes practically no use of different CPU cores: http://i.imgur.com/EC2j4gh.png
Because of this the CPU core that is actually used is a huge bottleneck and the graphics card and other CPU cores will just idle around and you still get low FPS.

I've only checked during America Campaign 2, but it's gonna be like this always I guess :/
you know that almost every game doens't support using 8 cores right? Its not just like you can magically make everything multi-theaded without problems.
OutLoud Nov 9, 2016 @ 1:47am 
Originally posted by Mom's Spaghetti:
Originally posted by OutLoud:

It doesn't unfortunately, it makes practically no use of different CPU cores: http://i.imgur.com/EC2j4gh.png
Because of this the CPU core that is actually used is a huge bottleneck and the graphics card and other CPU cores will just idle around and you still get low FPS.

I've only checked during America Campaign 2, but it's gonna be like this always I guess :/
you know that almost every game doens't support using 8 cores right? Its not just like you can magically make everything multi-theaded without problems.

It's 4 cores, 8 threads, but whatever ;)

Of course the developers know better and we can just guess. I'm seeing a pretty bad performance on my system, getting as low as 20 FPS at times on the small campaign maps. I'm not complaining, I enjoy the game, I'm just reporting.
The3hadow Nov 9, 2016 @ 1:49am 
Setting: zoomed in city @ high graphics setting @2560x1440p I got ~ 25fps (Campaign - America - Mission 2 - electric tram built, if you really want to know the exact setting).

CPU and GPU not fully used: http://i.imgur.com/6lvGUB4.png

My specs:
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3
8 GB RAM
GTX 1070
Win 10 64 bit

I dunno, I really want to enjoy this game, but this lag is causing me headaches.
Last edited by The3hadow; Nov 9, 2016 @ 1:52am
< >
Showing 1-15 of 21 comments
Per page: 15 30 50

Date Posted: Nov 8, 2016 @ 10:41pm
Posts: 21