Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Tax evasion is fairly common, actually.
Then why are you telling us? Go forward your evidence to HMRC because we couldn't do anything even if we believed your conspiracy ramblings.
You offer no facts or sources and instead rely on slanderous statements in a failed attempt to discredit OP. OP has far more credibility than you.
I can't anymore 😂😂😂😂
Why does that have anything to do with you?
Is there some grand conspiracy I'm missing, or are people just mad about other people doing their bookkeeping in a smart way?
Report and move on. Not worth getting into it with someone who shifts goalposts as fast as you kick the ball, and tries to twist anything you say to their own ends.
Yeah I'm pretty much done with him at this point too... nice link... shame it doesn't work or at least it doesn't on my end. Still though... I can do basic math and making a profit of 400K x 7 = 2.8M which is still only a third of the stated 7M..
At this point this is bordering on slander and I'll have no part in it.
This is surely very wrong. Even if you ignore all costs except those directly related to the employee, the additional costs should still be significant.
I did some internet searching, and get that the typical rule of thumb is that the cost of employing someone is around 25% to 40% more than just their salary. And that excludes the costs of actually finding and hiring them.
The numbers I remember hearing were significantly larger -- but that's probably a STEM field thing, where those costs need to include things like licensing for software tools, which I understand are notoriously expensive for corporations.
Oh, and don't forget the 15 additional people listed under "past team members and special thanks" that they had to hire and pay in the past. I don't know the timeframe on those.
---
That aside, there's also a very glaring omission in the speculation about their expenses: marketing.
I know some people like to act like Factorio does absolutely nothing to market their product, but color me skeptical that they could be such a well-selling product if they weren't spending money on things to keep the game in public awareness.
E.g. Factorio was actually in the 9/13 Nintendo Direct announcement, and there is actually a dedicated Factorio announcement trailer, a two-minute video in Nintendo of America's official youtube channel.
And wasn't Factorio appearing in some of the Steam Deck marketing?
Do you really think they didn't have to pay anything to get in on that?