login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem


When ever new information comes out, like about final fantasy recently, it is all like "it is so great and easy to implement but we cant say anything about a release".
Many players simply guessed by themselves that it was just waiting for Win10 1809 rerelease and even convinced others. How convenient. If it was, Devs or Nvidia just could have said so.
Now 1809 is rereleased and nether Hellblade nor Tomb Raider Devs have released patches.
Also it would be great to know if DLSS will be supported in the VR version but again, Devs wont tell.
Would be useful for VR.
do upscaling with sharpening = better picture by far.
Death Stranding. Control. Wolfenstein: Youngblood. Deliver Us The Moon. Watch Dogs Legion. And Cyberpunk 2077. Would all like to have a word with you. Most of those released after you made your comment sure, but they're also the biggest games to have it. Performance is increased up to 50% at 4k resolutions. And Death Strandings biggest DLSS glitch? Weird trails behind a few particle effects.
DLSS 1.0? Sure. DLSS 2.0? Shove your opinion right up your butt :-P
His post is from Nov 2019. And back then only game with 2.0 support was Control. And 2.0 didn't really catch any major attention until Death Stranding came out and blew everyone away.
So most anyone knew of DLSS back then was of 1.0. And that was very much indeed garbage...