ログイン
|
言語
简体中文 (簡体字中国語)
繁體中文 (繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português (ポルトガル語)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
Steam の翻訳にご協力ください


Seriously... I know you from poor jokes but giving players this for xmas is just cruel one.
"[Art][Blackbolt] - There are two crates clipping into each other on the roof above Point B next to the ruined tank."
So you've added two crates that clip into eachother, or you've removed them? Was this important enough to denote within the patch notes? Could you not have just said "We fixed more clipping and intersecting geometry within the maps" and then let that be a blanket for all assosiated unnecessary line items?
I feel like these last two patch notes are just half the script from a terrible Jeopardy episode for developers.
Me: I'll take "Ambiguous Statements" for 400, please.
BE: "The Howling Banshee Helmet that is part of a bundle in the Eldar shop has veteran glow effects around the eyes."
Me: What is an addition to Eldar equipment?
♥♥♥♥ my eyes, this format.
OMFG so much this!! This format is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ brutal, clumsy and so unorganized. So ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ hard to follow,
And no Umeå is friggin colder then Canada =P
What infos are you getting exactly? This article could have been just as informative if they left it blank. Half of the time the wording is such that it's unclear if they're adding flawed features, fixing old bugs or notifying us that they know ther's a problem and will fix it some time later. And the other half looks like it wasn't just not formatted, but rather formatted to be less readable.