Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade

Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade

Statistiche:
Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade > Eventi e annunci > Dettagli della discussione
27 gen 2017, ore 9:21
Crusader Top 10 list - Take two!
Informazioni complete sull'evento disponibili qui:
https://steamcommunity.com/ogg/375230/announcements/detail/246971493834509690
< >
Visualizzazione di 1-15 commenti su 47
Can you transmit the release date the first expansion? The addition of the terminator had to be done normally 3 months after the release of the game. We are at 4 months! :steammocking:
They still delay everything...
i wish i could atleast play, but im locked under infinite character loading screen
What about librarians and weird boyz so all of the factions have psykers.
GrizzlyBeer
They shouldnt be elite classes, veteran and elite classes have limmited lives and thus the two would have less impact on the games outcome due their limmited use, the only way to balance the imbalance caused by Chaos and Eldar psykers is to let all factions have unlimited access to their own psyker with their own playstyle and abilities.

Overall the development on Librarians and Weird boys should be a main priority when it comes to class design, then there is map balance that is needed due to how Swooping hawks players tend to exploit locations that are unreachable for all other factions, adding some kill zones were only they can reach would solve it, and there is some weapons that are overtuned and makes the encounters feel like a P2W encounter if the enemy is using it in high numbers (gazes at chaos)...
@Claptrap - LSM player, right? Never played tabletop or know the lore, right? SH's were just nerfed hard. Eldar don't have jump assault melee and SH grenades are terrible and not used. If anything they need reinstating to how they were two patches previously. I'd also argue that Sorcerer/Warlock are balanced by Apothecary/Painboy already.
There are two kinds of SM. SM and CSM. There is no such thing as LSM.
Maybe to fix elite balance, squad leaders of each army should be elites. That way it is randomized, if you don't want it you can promote and each army will have the same number. Instead of rank 5 unlocking elites it could unlock an ultimate abiity or something.
@ Fo@m : what about Lame Space Marines ? because half of this faction's players in this game are really bad...
The game sux and needs to be done over properly.
Hopefully by a totally different Dev Team and Company
Tbh, we need the open world which was a core aspect of what the product was promised to have, even pre-release. Then it was pushed for release and now post release. Frankly, while the game isn't atrocious, it's not what many of us payed for, and after giving the option to take back our cash, we chose to stay, as we were told we'd have our promised game for release.
thx in advance for fixing your stoneage backend.
Really?? Another top 10 wish list?!? What's the friggin' point? Except for the plasma cannon nerf (which still took MONTHS to kick in), nothing has been added from the previous list.
my top ten. 1. remove swooping hawks. 2.remove swooping hawks. 3 remove swooping hawks. 4. make eldar melee slower. 5.make eldar melee even more slower. 6. make eldar guns and melee wepons do less damage. 7.make eldar hitbox bigger. 8. fix eldar vehicles so they are not killing everybody just by lightly touching. and then make them so that you can use powerfist against them. 9. make power fist great again. like the ork claw is. big difference with this two. 10. nerf autocannon, kannon, grenades and all area effect bs weapons.
the melee points made me laugh, i've killed people as a DA in melee. top tip for you ranged people who struggle, Play a melee character first get used to the system and then go ranged and you'll find that it wasn't so bad, powerword spams? hold block down before he gets to you and then roll back plow him with bullets. but seriously play melee before you go ranged
< >
Visualizzazione di 1-15 commenti su 47
Per pagina: 15 30 50

Warhammer 40,000: Eternal Crusade > Eventi e annunci > Dettagli della discussione