Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
If you don't have good communication you'll lose 9 out of 10 times no matter how leet of a team you have. I've been playing this franchise from the start and teams that communicate win, those that don't, don't.
Fun fact, a flamer doesnt have "recoil" like weapons do, its the same as using a fire extinguisher.
Please don't speak about something you not do have a single clue about. Flamethrowers do have HEAVY recoil in real life. Here's a little something so you can smarten up:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?comments=1&i=e85_1343563999
(All I had to do is google: flamethrower recoil. It took 5 min. You could have done the same thing and avoid looking like a ♥♥♥♥♥♥)
No recoil huh? See how the guy is brassing like hell? And even then, he lands on his ass. This, is a modern flamer, guess how it was in the 40's? Flamethrowers in RS are unrealistic, period. This as been discussed several times, and we all know it. TWI don't give a flying ♥♥♥♥ about balance in RS, and won't do anything about it 'cause they don't care. Now, can we move on please?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpE3OgTNq5M
As you can see, considerably less recoil. What's the point of showing a modern flamethrower from another country? It's be like using footage of someone with a counterweighted, sight-equipped compound bow to answer a debate on how accurate an English Longbowman could be at the Battle of Halidon Hill.
Anyways, the whole thing was that the guy said flamethrowers had ZERO recoil, wich is not true, and we both know it, right? Right. So, now I ask you, what was your point demonstrating what I already demonstrated, maybe in a more extreme manner (yeah the flamer in my video is kinda like on steroids). I don't want to offend you, but I think your intervention was unneeded as what you said is not in context.
I mean, burning fuel in the face, I get it, that can put you out of combat instantly, but burning fuel in the arms or legs and that's all, you're unable to fire back?, seriously?
TWE:yea but how about the japanse soldiers?
TW:just give them banzai charge with 1% more stamina&bulletresistance :trollface: