全面戰爭:幕府將軍2

全面戰爭:幕府將軍2

檢視統計資料:
Daddy Cum Cannon 2014 年 3 月 6 日 下午 3:37
FoTS or Nepolionic war?
Witch one is better? I like the weaponry and strategys of the time period. So just witch ever packs the most content.
< >
目前顯示第 1-9 則留言,共 9
easytarget (已封鎖) 2014 年 3 月 6 日 下午 4:50 
This is a forum dedicated to Shogun 2, so naturally I'm going to recommend FOTS.

Besides, in my opinion Napoleon was too constrained in design.
Daddy Cum Cannon 2014 年 3 月 6 日 下午 5:12 
引用自 easytarget
This is a forum dedicated to Shogun 2, so naturally I'm going to recommend FOTS.

Besides, in my opinion Napoleon was too constrained in design.

Thank you. Yeah I kind of wanted FoTS just because I much perfer the Japense setting then the Nepolionic one.
Colvinator 2014 年 3 月 6 日 下午 6:22 
I love Napoleon its a great game.
ANKH 2014 年 3 月 6 日 下午 9:10 
FOTS battles make napoleon battles look like watching paint dry. People die so much faster, the explosions are so much more graphic and bloody than napoleon even w/ the blood and smoke mod. Naval bombarments and way better ai make this an unfair contest. I'd say FOTS
Daniel The Scottish 2014 年 3 月 7 日 上午 1:31 
All TTW Series are great and need buy them all with all DLC but Not ROme TOtal War 2 ... RTW 2 failed game..
PistolChimp 2014 年 3 月 7 日 上午 8:48 
Napoleon is BECAUSE the weapons aren't as devestating. Battlelines have time to develope, and artillery, while good, isn't overpowered.
Colvinator 2014 年 3 月 7 日 上午 10:17 
引用自 Daniel The Scottish
All TTW Series are great and need buy them all with all DLC but Not ROme TOtal War 2 ... RTW 2 failed game..

Yes!
Daddy Cum Cannon 2014 年 3 月 7 日 上午 11:46 
引用自 PistolChimp
Napoleon is BECAUSE the weapons aren't as devestating. Battlelines have time to develope, and artillery, while good, isn't overpowered.

Actually I would perfer to have much slower more realistic battles then faster more unrealstic battles. I like the idea of less people dieing because thats what would happen back then. Did you know the base casualtie numbers in battles back in the Canadian civil war where around 16 casualties per battle. Lol.
ANKH 2014 年 3 月 7 日 下午 12:44 
FOTS is just as realistic as Nappy TW. It's just that it took longer to load and reload in the early 1800's than the late 1800's. Also the kill range for the rifles in FOTS is like double which increases carnage DRASTICALLY yet realistically. Compare casualties in the war of 1812 to the civil war. 24,000 to 660,000

Really, if you like slower attrition combat, get napoleon. If you like carnage and blood, explosions people dropping like flies from fast reloading carbines and breech loaders, go FOTS.

Honestly I'm a fan of both, but prefer FOTS
最後修改者:ANKH; 2014 年 3 月 7 日 下午 12:51
< >
目前顯示第 1-9 則留言,共 9
每頁顯示: 1530 50

張貼日期: 2014 年 3 月 6 日 下午 3:37
回覆: 9