login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Help us translate Steam
I have a lot of experience with the game in the earlier beta, but I haven't bought it yet. Can I also test this version?
We will move it to a public beta after new year if all goes well - we can't provide updates or patches until then anyway.
I know you can't get patches out; but at least it would mean potentailly more data to work with when you do return to the office so that the first patches can potentialy fix more.
I think the population of players is niche enough that people dropping into the forums with significant problems with the new version would easily be directed to roll-back and users have to opt-into beta releases anyway.
Then what's the point of Early Access? Isn't it our job as both consumers and investors to find bugs and issues and notify the developers to improve the product? I definately do not agree with a invite-based update.
I think they just want to avoid people going toxic because what DID work suddenly stops working when the developers are not in a position to reliably issue out patches to fix those issues. So they make it a request-feature to get in so that people getting in REALLY know the potential risk .