Cerys/Hjalmar SPOILER Thread

[Ace Rimmer]

edit: Went off topic so changed the title









The choice and consequences of making them king/queen.

[3jackDaw]

haha same position here buddy. I did not think twice to kill Dijstra even tho I was starting to like the fat bastarrrd. But he was never a good guy in the first place, Plus it was Geralt's fault he had to walk like forest gump for the rest of his life so they were never going to be friends.

[Ace Rimmer]

He was a pragmatic guy but i also took him for being intelligent. He should have waited till Geralt was gone before he moved in for the kill. Redania- the country of madmen.

[3jackDaw]

But as the player would you not seek our revenge for the death of roach and ves?

[Ace Rimmer]

Geralt has his hands full with The Wild Hunt but yes afterwards i would be out for revenge. However if he was smart Dijkstra would have castle walls and hundreds of men guarding him by then.

[3jackDaw]

Originally posted by AUTOEXEC.BAT:

U retarded imbecile put ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ spooler in the title ♥♥♥♥♥

he did put a spoiler. wtf

[3jackDaw]

Originally posted by Johntje:

Geralt has his hands full with The Wild Hunt but yes afterwards i would be out for revenge. However if he was smart Dijkstra would have castle walls and hundreds of men guarding him by then.

Good point. Which is why Redania should never take over, I mean c'mon is niflgaard really that bad?

[sleeper]

Why is Dijkstra so dumb Geralt is a very famous and powerful warrior and with less then 100 well trained soldiers and that is if he is alone he had no chance really. Dijkstra should have made his power play after Geralt went away.

[Z]

Originally posted by 3jackDaw:

Originally posted by Johntje:

Geralt has his hands full with The Wild Hunt but yes afterwards i would be out for revenge. However if he was smart Dijkstra would have castle walls and hundreds of men guarding him by then.

Good point. Which is why Redania should never take over, I mean c'mon is niflgaard really that bad?

Would you be okay with any country taking over yours, even if they were slightly more tolerable?

[WouldYouKindly]

I was really taken aback by this. Dijkstra is supposed to be very cunning and has sources of information everywhere. He should have known that Geralt was loyal friends to Roche and Ves (depending on W2 choices) and that Geralt wouldn't just walk away while his friends were killed. Dijkstra knows what Geralt is capable of... and he did not bring enough henchmen to take them all on. There is no way he would think that Geralt would agree with his plan.

One other sequence that really made me shake my head is during Now or Never. When your way is blocked in the sewer, Triss freaks out with the whole "We are doomed!" squealing bit. This same woman who rains fire from the sky later in the game is defeated by a crumbing wall. It seemed really out of character for such a strong woman in W1 and 2.

[3jackDaw]

Originally posted by TSYR119-A:

Originally posted by 3jackDaw:

Good point. Which is why Redania should never take over, I mean c'mon is niflgaard really that bad?

Would you be okay with any country taking over yours, even if they were slightly more tolerable?

Well no. But seriously if your country was killing innocent peoplr (the non-humans/magic peeps) could you tolerate that? In terms of morality any decent human being (given lets say this person is a good person) would surely pick the "lesser evil". On another note for books and the series, nilfgaard was already technically helping with the economy even imporving it.

[3jackDaw]

Originally posted by WouldYouKindly:

I was really taken aback by this. Dijkstra is supposed to be very cunning and has sources of information everywhere. He should have known that Geralt was loyal friends to Roche and Ves (depending on W2 choices) and that Geralt wouldn't just walk away while his friends were killed. Dijkstra knows what Geralt is capable of... and he did not bring enough henchmen to take them all on. There is no way he would think that Geralt would agree with his plan.

One other sequence that really made me shake my head is during Now or Never. When your way is blocked in the sewer, Triss freaks out with the whole "We are doomed!" squealing bit. This same woman who rains fire from the sky later in the game is defeated by a crumbing wall. It seemed really out of character for such a strong woman in W1 and 2.

dude I totally just noticed all of that now. damn. Okay for the game's concern, yes that was a bitt of. It was obvious he would have to fight geralt since he didn't wait for him to leave. But then again he just brought like a couple of bros to the fight. So if you really think about it (in terms of the game itself) yea, he really did think that geralt would let it slide.

also in W2 even if you side with Iorveth, didn't roach still have yer back?? such a bro. haha

[Robespierre]

That's right, he does. There is no independence of the mercy of the enemy. It is stupid to Vichy. On the north Dykstra defeated the Nazis. A Roche - a necessary sacrifice.

[Ace Rimmer]

Originally posted by 3jackDaw:

Originally posted by Johntje:

Geralt has his hands full with The Wild Hunt but yes afterwards i would be out for revenge. However if he was smart Dijkstra would have castle walls and hundreds of men guarding him by then.

Good point. Which is why Redania should never take over, I mean c'mon is niflgaard really that bad?

No i would say that it really isnt especially since they allow Temeria to exist as a vassal state.

[Ace Rimmer]

Originally posted by 3jackDaw:

Originally posted by WouldYouKindly:

I was really taken aback by this. Dijkstra is supposed to be very cunning and has sources of information everywhere. He should have known that Geralt was loyal friends to Roche and Ves (depending on W2 choices) and that Geralt wouldn't just walk away while his friends were killed. Dijkstra knows what Geralt is capable of... and he did not bring enough henchmen to take them all on. There is no way he would think that Geralt would agree with his plan.

One other sequence that really made me shake my head is during Now or Never. When your way is blocked in the sewer, Triss freaks out with the whole "We are doomed!" squealing bit. This same woman who rains fire from the sky later in the game is defeated by a crumbing wall. It seemed really out of character for such a strong woman in W1 and 2.

dude I totally just noticed all of that now. damn. Okay for the game's concern, yes that was a bitt of. It was obvious he would have to fight geralt since he didn't wait for him to leave. But then again he just brought like a couple of bros to the fight. So if you really think about it (in terms of the game itself) yea, he really did think that geralt would let it slide.

also in W2 even if you side with Iorveth, didn't roach still have yer back?? such a bro. haha

That last part, yeah Roche saves your ass even if you do side with Iorveth.

[cassiels]

Ever since TW2 I have had a hate for Dijkstra. When he showed up in 3 all I thought about was: when do I get a chance to kill him? Then when he started to get all chummy and helping I hated him even more. I mean, look at his body and his head, he is my hate personified. It felt so so good to chop his head off. Forever out of the series.

He knows Geralt hates politics plus he judges others by his own morals: use whoever you can for your own purposes and then leave them or kill them. So he probably thought Geralt would walk away.

I wonder what everyone would have done if we were given a choice to let him and Roche/Ves live. I would have killed him with all my passionate hate for him.