Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
Subnautica was being birthed right around the time of the Sandy Hook shooting. This was a particularly nasty shooting, although many people don't realize America has school shootings every day. Every. Single. Day.
(5/8/16 UPDATE: I meant to say "mass" shootings, not "school" shootings: http://www.gunviolencearchive.org/reports/mass-shooting and http://www.gunviolencearchive.org/reports/mass-shootings/2015)
Yet, for reasons I cannot understand, our people and the corporations that influence our country want to continue making it easy for people to get, carry and use pistols, semi-automatic and fully-automatic weapons.
I've never believed that video game violence creates more real-world violence. But I couldn't just sit by and "add more guns" to the world either.
So Subnautica is one vote towards a world with less guns. A reminder that there is another way forward. One where we use non-violent and more creative solutions to solve our problems. One where we are not at the top of the food chain.
I've always felt that this game was never meant to have weapons, and now that I've seen why, my opinion has been strengthened.
well said, and that does make sense.
I'm totally fine with non-violent goals such as research being the main objective of the game and that's more than sufficient a reason.
This whole mass-shootings deal makes no sense, because we already have means to defend ourselves in game, and we're talking about sci-fi weaponry and harpoons, neither of which have killed more teenagers than knives and vehicles, which are both perfectly usable tools of death in game.
I also believe that your vote toward a world with less guns is a nice idea, but completely out of place when we're talking about the imaginary world of subnautica where everything wants to eat you.
As for not being the top of the foodchain, are you saying there are creatures out there with a better cyclops than mine? If so i'm looking forward to it.
Are you dense? He just told you why they won't add weapons.
While I respectfully acknowledge and understand where you're coming from (I distinctly remember what I was doing when that happened), I will say two opposing things on this.
1. Yes it is too easy to get access to guns (especially for criminals or the mentally unwell), and there should be more thorough background checks on people before getting weapons.
2. People judge the small amount (by comparison) of people who commit crimes using guns as the majority, even though the majority never actually use their gun or use it for self defense, hunting, or even for show like Skeet Shooting.
I will agree that we don't need an excessive amount of weapons in Subnautica, but instead of lethal weapons could we at least look at the non-lethal alternatives and potentially some more of those? Like a pod launcher that could launch Gasopod Gas Canisters, Flares, etc. Or being able to build an energy fence around our bases, things like that
If you want to get technical, getting terraformed probably isn't that great for indigenous lifeforms, either.
Maybe you need to simmer the %^&$ down.