Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
:-)
People wanted Total War and didn't get it. Shame too...
Honestly, if the devs had just made this a near-carbon-copy of a Total War game, with the RPG elements and magic added, it probably would have done /really/ well, especially among Total War fans. The legend of The Once and Future King is a good one, and as much as this game gets a lot right, it falls flat in the areas that Total War has never gotten wrong. The game looks like Total War, controls like Total War, but completely misses a huge portion of what makes Total War fun.
So yeah, how to ensure victory now ? Archers, Archers, Light cavalry to catch VP and a mixed Frontline. Spearmen are completly unneeded as cavalry sucks hardcore in fights. Just shoot them down with Archers before they are even able to reach you.
However the only real playthrough I've done of this game is an Unseelie one, and admittedly I didn't find it very hard even with a lack of cavalry. Archers in this game are more OP than cavalry are.