ติดตั้ง Steam
เข้าสู่ระบบ
|
ภาษา
简体中文 (จีนตัวย่อ)
繁體中文 (จีนตัวเต็ม)
日本語 (ญี่ปุ่น)
한국어 (เกาหลี)
български (บัลแกเรีย)
Čeština (เช็ก)
Dansk (เดนมาร์ก)
Deutsch (เยอรมัน)
English (อังกฤษ)
Español - España (สเปน)
Español - Latinoamérica (สเปน - ลาตินอเมริกา)
Ελληνικά (กรีก)
Français (ฝรั่งเศส)
Italiano (อิตาลี)
Bahasa Indonesia (อินโดนีเซีย)
Magyar (ฮังการี)
Nederlands (ดัตช์)
Norsk (นอร์เวย์)
Polski (โปแลนด์)
Português (โปรตุเกส - โปรตุเกส)
Português - Brasil (โปรตุเกส - บราซิล)
Română (โรมาเนีย)
Русский (รัสเซีย)
Suomi (ฟินแลนด์)
Svenska (สวีเดน)
Türkçe (ตุรกี)
Tiếng Việt (เวียดนาม)
Українська (ยูเครน)
รายงานปัญหาเกี่ยวกับการแปลภาษา
Also we need more units i know you think 32 players a game is a small section of a trench but the section alone would have around 40 50 or if time of a charge was come 60 people would be able to attack the maps are big and they need more players. idk why you and the devs are agianst this it would make the game a lot better and it would add a lot more fun aspects such as :
Having trench attackers and defender and having a group of guys or acommunity playing 1 team or clan v another clan not a squad v squad.
from what im told by the people who know all is this games going to die. you need to add players and you need to make a game that is fun for new players. I dont want to see the only ww2 fps out there to die to a dumb reason such as small player count.
If you're just going to whine then stop using the computer
I guess you should stop by your logic then :)
What I'm doing isn't whining, so no.
I could go on further in depth about "why more players", but I'll spare you all that as many of you already know from the dozens of other threads on the subject. This will however remain an eternal question that will haunt Verdun unless and until it actually happens.
"What is dead may never die"
My responce hell ya at least one of you verdun people get it