login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Help us translate Steam
However if you mean just covering Gallipoli then no, it would be too small for it's own setting but would be a possible map if they covered the region. Debate in the community of where it should go though. Middle East with the other campaigns against the Ottomans or the Balkans with the main focus being Serbia and Salonika.
Middle East hasn't been popular in community polls and the Balkans are a bit of a powder keg.
IMO if they want to go with Gallipoli they might as well combine it with Balkans and ME so it's going to be something decent-sized and covering basically the Balkans+Ottomans. Problem is, there's basically only Turks and Austro-Hungarians there for Central...right?
Bulgaria...
Also, Gallipoli was historically part of the Salonika theatre, so it makes sense to link it in that manner.
Also I think Tannenberg is great and deserves more players.