Upcoming Large Update: Wishes

[ArrowViper]

We'll definitely gonna see a T-90M aren't we? So far, the devblog vehicles are from east, meaning this update will have an East vibe...so could it be called like Red Menace or something?

[Weltreisender]

I would like to see Leo 2A7 and Kf51 Panther

https://youtu.be/hdIpfc0p26M?si=gWngTIq73kX7lMnH

[ArrowViper]

İlk olarak Weltreisender tarafından gönderildi:

I would like to see Leo 2A7 and Kf51 Panther

https://youtu.be/hdIpfc0p26M?si=gWngTIq73kX7lMnH

Kf51 Panther is a Prototype and Technology demonstrator...even T-14 Armata is a more real vehicle

[The Uncleanest One]

İlk olarak ArrowViper tarafından gönderildi:

Kf51 Panther is a Prototype and Technology demonstrator...even T-14 Armata is a more real vehicle

The KF51 is not a prototype. While in testing, just like the Puma IFV, it is the next new tank that Germany is going to use. What truly is a prototype, well more a proof of concept, is the Abrams X.

[~[Amadeus]~]

İlk olarak The Uncleanest One tarafından gönderildi:

İlk olarak ArrowViper tarafından gönderildi:

Kf51 Panther is a Prototype and Technology demonstrator...even T-14 Armata is a more real vehicle

The KF51 is not a prototype. While in testing, just like the Puma IFV, it is the next new tank that Germany is going to use. What truly is a prototype, well more a proof of concept, is the Abrams X.

Isnt AbramsX just a technology demonstrator/test bed for all the latest tech made by company without government contract?

[The Uncleanest One]

İlk olarak ~Amadeus~ tarafından gönderildi:

Isnt AbramsX just a technology demonstrator/test bed for all the latest tech made by company without government contract?

Yes it is but, it's also a proof of concept of what could be made if the USA closes a couple of public schools and gives the money to the company. I doubt that the USA military will take everything from the Abrams X and make a tank out of it (maybe an export model at most) as they're doctrine requires loaders.

[ThomasNorge224]

Im waiting for the day gaijin adds a vehicle for a nation that needs it. or a vehicle that isnt just a slight variation of one that already exists. Like who tf asked for a T-55 but with a flamethrower??? nobody, and nobody cares about it either.

[Offline]

İlk olarak ThomasNorge224 tarafından gönderildi:

Im waiting for the day gaijin adds a vehicle for a nation that needs it. or a vehicle that isnt just a slight variation of one that already exists. Like who tf asked for a T-55 but with a flamethrower??? nobody, and nobody cares about it either.

I would use Vehicles with Falmetrowhers but only if they actually do something like overheating the engine and setting it on fire. Right everything flame related feels useless.

[French Cat]

İlk olarak ThomasNorge224 tarafından gönderildi:

Im waiting for the day gaijin adds a vehicle for a nation that needs it. or a vehicle that isnt just a slight variation of one that already exists. Like who tf asked for a T-55 but with a flamethrower??? nobody, and nobody cares about it either.

I did ever since I played Wargame European Escalation

[Chaoslord 87]

İlk olarak Offline tarafından gönderildi:

I would use Vehicles with Falmetrowhers but only if they actually do something like overheating the engine and setting it on fire. Right everything flame related feels useless.

Or slowly hurting crew and/or ammo with prolonged exposure.

[76561199467657242]

İlk olarak Offline tarafından gönderildi:

İlk olarak ThomasNorge224 tarafından gönderildi:

Im waiting for the day gaijin adds a vehicle for a nation that needs it. or a vehicle that isnt just a slight variation of one that already exists. Like who tf asked for a T-55 but with a flamethrower??? nobody, and nobody cares about it either.

I would use Vehicles with Falmetrowhers but only if they actually do something like overheating the engine and setting it on fire. Right everything flame related feels useless.

IRL a flamethrower would cook a vehcile's crew - think how hot a metal pot gets when above a fire - now imagine that fire has added fuel to make fire more dense and hot - flametrhowers are very effective against tanks - not in terms of vehicle damage but by suffocating the crew and bruning them alive

[~[Amadeus]~]

İlk olarak 26kangn tarafından gönderildi:

İlk olarak Offline tarafından gönderildi:

I would use Vehicles with Falmetrowhers but only if they actually do something like overheating the engine and setting it on fire. Right everything flame related feels useless.

IRL a flamethrower would cook a vehcile's crew - think how hot a metal pot gets when above a fire - now imagine that fire has added fuel to make fire more dense and hot - flametrhowers are very effective against tanks - not in terms of vehicle damage but by suffocating the crew and bruning them alive

Toasty!

[Eila Deker]

İlk olarak 26kangn tarafından gönderildi:

İlk olarak Offline tarafından gönderildi:

I would use Vehicles with Falmetrowhers but only if they actually do something like overheating the engine and setting it on fire. Right everything flame related feels useless.

IRL a flamethrower would cook a vehcile's crew - think how hot a metal pot gets when above a fire - now imagine that fire has added fuel to make fire more dense and hot - flametrhowers are very effective against tanks - not in terms of vehicle damage but by suffocating the crew and bruning them alive

not all tanks though as some have extra layers so it takes way longer to heat up the inside

[Paveway]

I want SAS jeep with MGs, AP 50cal, at 1.0 BR. How about a LMTV gun truck with Javelin launcher (used by SF in the north invasion of Iraq). More weird vehicles.

[Offline]

İlk olarak Eila Deker tarafından gönderildi:

İlk olarak 26kangn tarafından gönderildi:

IRL a flamethrower would cook a vehcile's crew - think how hot a metal pot gets when above a fire - now imagine that fire has added fuel to make fire more dense and hot - flametrhowers are very effective against tanks - not in terms of vehicle damage but by suffocating the crew and bruning them alive

not all tanks though as some have extra layers so it takes way longer to heat up the inside

There are many potential flame tanks for low tier. Pretty much every nation had something suitable and in low tier matches flamethrowers make more sense and more importantly more fun

[76561199467657242]

İlk olarak Eila Deker tarafından gönderildi:

İlk olarak 26kangn tarafından gönderildi:

IRL a flamethrower would cook a vehcile's crew - think how hot a metal pot gets when above a fire - now imagine that fire has added fuel to make fire more dense and hot - flametrhowers are very effective against tanks - not in terms of vehicle damage but by suffocating the crew and bruning them alive

not all tanks though as some have extra layers so it takes way longer to heat up the inside

during ww2 and before i would say most tanks would not do good if covered in flames - is literally a stove with people burning to death - idk about modern/cold war tanks - maybe they would do sligtly better - the main drawback is flamethrower don't have best range