Instalar o Steam
Iniciar sessão
|
Idioma
简体中文 (Chinês Simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês Tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol de Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol da América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Brasil)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar problema de tradução
Yes because a guy would buy tampons to better their life and enjoy them. Makes perfect sense.
No there should not be any sort of redlight(the redlight is by not voting for it or voting "no")
They should add more categories, that would make things interesting
This game isn't very appealing to me, but I figured that out from the first video trailer (and subsequently every other piece of media I found about it). The categories help with searches that can connect players to games they might like but have never heard of or seen before. Empower the consumer by providing them real information about the game, not these categories that are already nebulous.
I still say new category. Besides, there might be people into this ♥♥♥♥. They would love a category that links them to Dear Esther and the like.
I guess there must be over a dozen games at least on steam that slot directly into this category and quite a few others that crossover between this category and another.
I fail to see how helping to categorize these titles in another way would cause problems - it would make it easier for those who want to find such titles and for those who whine about buying something they did not expect it should make it more obvious what they are getting into.
On the other hand I do think that there should be a way to highlight titles that have ripped off players, contain too many bugs to be playable and do not deliver on their promises such as the war z. In this case the players should be able to raise an alarm bell causing several members of the steam qc department to have to take a close look at what they are selling.
Definition 2.
http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/160393?rskey=FMXHz1&result=1&isAdvanced=false#eid
People just need to be more intelligent and inform themselves about their purchases. Its almost always as easy as just clicking the forum button and seeing what others are saying. If anything, I guess Valve could spruce up the forum button on a game page. Maybe make it a color that stands out slightly more and says something like "See what others are saying about this game on the forums!"
Not a big fan of community ratings showing up on the game page either, to be honest. If its a metacritic rating thats one thing, but if you're just showing the results of a smaller pool of reviews it'll be more susceptible to some gamers with agendas coming along and influencing the score one way or the other. I don't mean to paint gamers in a worse light than they already are... but come on, we all know there are people who have no better way to use their time than affecting video game review scores.
It has an initial setup, it has progression, and it can have an end/victory condition.